One bird killed is one too many, founder says

Avian Extinction Rebellion is a new wing of the environmental protest group that has been set up to oppose wind farms because of the danger they pose to birds. This is a sudden and unexpected sea change in XR’s attitude to wind power: what happened?

AXR’s founder, who goes by the nom de guerre Lavender Tuesday, tells me she saw the light on a day trip to Bempton Cliffs last July.

“This white-cis male of a certain age had one of those devices you look through to make faraway things look closer, and he let me have a go with it,” Lavender says. “He pointed out some of the birds that were there, razorbills and puffins, you know, but I only had eyes for the kittiwakes. How beautiful they were!”

The white-cis male of a certain age who was the owner of an Optolith spotting scope told the XR member to enjoy them while she could.

“They’re dying out because of Climate change,” Lavender remembers replying.

The birdwatcher smiled a sad smile and said, “In a manner of speaking.” When she asked him to explain himself, he first said, “The wind farms,” and when pressed further, he explained: “Between the ones we already have and those that are planned so far, offshore wind farms will cover 12,000 square kilometres of the sea around the UK. You won’t be able to see the big ones from here. They’ll be out there. Out of sight from most of us. But we know they will kill kittiwakes.”

In a dour commuter town on a misty day in late March where I am interviewing the spokesperson for Avian Extinction Rebellion over an oatmilk latte, the fear of kittiwakes flying into the blades of offshore wind turbines seems a very abstract one. But the fear was very real for Lavender Tuesday on that July day last year.

“I was stunned,” she tells me. “I wandered a little further along the cliff, then I just stopped walking and let the sun warm my face for a while. I could hear the cries of the seabirds all around me – they seemed to be accusing me of bearing witness to their peril but doing nothing to help them. Especially the kittiwakes. They have such a beautiful call, not like one of those gulls that steal your chips… I stood there so long I managed to pick a hole in my woolly jumper. This one kittiwake just kept staring at me with her beady eye, and from nowhere I began to cry. I was overcome by my connection with Nature, and I fell onto my knees in the dry grass and cried out to Mrs Kittiwake that I was so so sorry for being a human, so so sorry for being a part of what was destroying them.”

That was when the idea of Avian Extinction Rebellion was hatched. At the next regional XR strategy meeting, Tuesday raised the idea of opposing the expansion of offshore wind farms. She recalls playing the group a sound clip of a kittiwake’s call.

“They all just stared at me for ages. I could tell how deeply moved they were.”

The group was immediately receptive to her worries. One member came up with their new campaign slogan with his very next words: “One bird killed is one too many.”

Someone else came up with a logo on the inside of a packet of sugar-free mints a few seconds later. Asked if the result looks like a bird flying into a wind turbine and being sliced in half, Tuesday wrinkles her nose. “No. It looks like a free bird flying high in the sky, at one with Gaia.”

But AXR had another problem. Without offshore wind, how would Net Zero be achievable? Where would the people of the UK get their electricity? Coal and gas were forbidden. Onshore wind was no better than offshore wind. Solar – even with progress in the new science of neutrino-opaque materials – was all but useless. Biomass had fallen out of favour for the wholesale destruction of forests someone had finally noticed it caused. There was only one thing left.

“It was a choice between the lights going out – and one or two did argue for that – or embracing nukes,” Tuesday tells me.

Nukes! I was surprised by that, but Lavender Tuesday was deadly serious. I pointed out that environmental groups had opposed nuclear power for decades.

“That’s because they link it with nuclear weapons,” she explained. “We need to get rid of the impression that there is such a link. Civilian nuclear is perfectly safe, and the amount of energy obtainable from a tiny amount of matter is just incredible. It’s a limitless carbon-free source of power!”

AXR are planning a campaign of direct action to run alongside their parent group’s summer of disobedience. “We’re going to block lorries from taking blades and towers to these death mills. Obviously it’s a bit harder for us to block the barges from taking blades and towers to the offshore farms, but we’ve been in touch with Sea Shepherd to see if they will help with that.”

“One bird killed is one too many,” Lavender repeats her mantra again. Then she brightens. “But we won’t be miserable! We want it to be a party! There will be singing and vegan barbecues, poetry, juggling and puppet shows. We’re going to have a mass die-in of dolphins too. Did you know that the vibration of offshore turbines can confuse the navigation systems of cetaceans, leading them to beach themselves in despair? Without the support of the water, their bodies just collapse.”

I ask whether the usual XR Red Widows will be at the protests.

“Yes,” she says with a smile, “but they’ll be dressed as kittiwakes from now on.”

15 Comments

  1. “One bird killed is one too many” seems a rather paisty slogan. Use of the epithet “Death Mills” has much more drama. Pictures of dead puffins might do the trick.

    Can’t see that the group will have much success in convincing people, especially about nuclear power, and the timings are all wrong. We seem now to be locked-into renewables.

    Like

  2. Wow! XR finally make some sense and obviously not controlled/sponsored by George Soros, like AFA/AntiFa and BLM are …

    But on the other hand, it’s April 1st …

    Liked by 3 people

  3. “Pictures of dead puffins might do the trick.”

    Oh, good grief.

    I’ve never seen a puffin fly more than 10 feet above the sea, except when they are close to their roosts, so the idea that they could get tangled up in a 200metre high turbine is pure fantasy.

    Like

  4. Bill I know little of puffins, only ever seen them once in Anglesey. But no less an authority than the PSPB warned in 2020 that puffins were at risk of extinction by offshore wind farms. Do you mean to say that that august body was lying to us, or at the very least was misinformed (good grief yourself!)

    If you don’t like puffins, how about dead gannets?

    Like

  5. Will Saturday (2April) see the demise of this new avianophyllic movement?

    Will the kittiwakes
    still cry out in vain?
    The Red Widows sans plumage
    Oh what a terrible shame.
    An April dream crashes
    Splintering fantasies.
    Shame on you JIT

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Alan Kendall says:

    “Bill I know little of puffins, only ever seen them once in Anglesey. But no less an authority than the PSPB warned in 2020 that puffins were at risk of extinction by offshore wind farms. Do you mean to say that that august body was lying to us, or at the very least was misinformed (good grief yourself!)”

    Odd that the RSPB picked out puffin for this armageddon and left out all the other auks with similar feeding habits. But then, the animal-porn advertising rule says that using the cutest, most iconic animal is a sure-fire way of getting the public’s sympathy. A similar campaign featuring a chip-stealing herring gull would be likely to backfire even though the gull population has fallen more than the puffin.

    “If you don’t like puffins, how about dead gannets?”

    Gannets only fly high when they are hunting or when they can ride the updraughts close to cliffs. So the risks they have would depend on whether their prey species were likely to shoal close to turbine towers.

    Like

  7. Brilliant. Beautifully done. A lot of smiles and laughs, while making some very serious points. Thank you.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Alan/Bill

    I am sure that puffins are not in peril of flying into turbine blades. Perhaps the RSPB were worried that they would be displaced from feeding grounds? I’ll look into it. Meanwhile, the flight heights of seabirds re: collision risk is a matter of controversy, in my own mind at least. I’ve reason to believe that things are “worse than we thought.” It’s a subject I will mention in these pages when I have a mo.

    Yes, this fantasy will go off faster than the milk in your fridge. And it’s not a hopeful fantasy. It’s more like the end of Brazil.

    Like

  9. JIT. It occurs to me that a puffin need not be hit by a wind turbine blade to suffer. Perhaps the blade movement disturbs the air sufficiently that a bird like a puffin, seemingly barely airworthy, might get into repeated difficulties. [I was amazed at their aerobatics but presumably their shape and dimensions allow them this ability]. With a close array of turbines birds might be deterred from entering whole areas to fish.

    Like

  10. Well JIT when we’re you going to enlighten us? Neutrino-opaque materials for solar panels? Lucky my friend Google was able to advise “For typical neutrinos produced in the sun (with energies of a few MeV), it would take approximately one light year of lead to block half of them”. Gosh.
    How many more little traps have you set?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.