I have noticed lately that Councils are starting to suggest that their net zero targets are going to be difficult to meet. At the same time, they express a determination to press on with them, while steep cuts are often made to their budgets relating to important local services.

This morning, I spotted a piece on the BBC website with the headline “Lincoln Council warned going green will be costly”. We learn:

A senior City of Lincoln councillor has admitted hitting its carbon net zero target by 2030 would be difficult due to the poor financial situation.

Councillor Bob Bushell (Labour) faced questions on whether the council was still on track to reach this goal.

Mr Bushell maintained he was confident of the council’s success – but warned it would be expensive.

Faced with this information, I thought I would dig a bit deeper regarding what is going on in Lincoln. The easiest piece of information to find (because the BBC helpfully provided a link to it) is that Lincoln Council has a 32 page “Decarbonisation Strategy and Action Plan Responding to the Climate Emergency 2021-2030. I would have thought that the most important part of any action plan would be detailed costings, but I searched this plan for those in vain. There are lots of tables with column headings such as “Priority objective”, “actions”, “measure”, “target”, “RAG” (an unexplained acronym), and “responsible service area” . But no costings. Still, at least we do know – courtesy of Councillor Bushell – that it will be expensive.

Meanwhile, the website of the Lincolnite tells us that the Council is facing a £1 million budget shortfall, and that it is looking at “all options”. My money’s on “net zero” plans being at the end of the line for cuts. Curiosly, given that housing insulation is part of the Council’s decarbonisation plan, we also learn that there has been a “‘Tenfold’ increase in Lincoln council mould reports” since the reporting of the tragic death in Rochdale of a two year old boy due to exposure to mould. The Council has set up a new team to handle the surge in calls from residents, while the numbers of calls continue to grow. Poor-quality insulation can, of course, worsen such problems.

The Guardian has also recently reported on the shambles that is Thurrock Council. While Lincoln Council is Labour-run, Thurrock is Conservative-controlled. These days, of course, that makes little difference, since both parties are equally inept, and both seem to be equally committed to net zero.

In fairness to Lincoln, however, Thurrock’s problems are on a wholly different scale:

The Tory-led Thurrock council, which is on the brink of bankruptcy after losing hundreds of millions of pounds on failed commercial investments, repeatedly ignored warnings from financial experts over the “unprecedented risks” it was taking with public money, it has emerged.

Those risks seem to have been varied and substantial, but perhaps the greatest of all was that “[t]hey included £655m invested in a solar farms company, Toucan Holdings 1, which went into administration this month.”

Needless to say, Thurrock Council declared a climate emergency on 23rd October 2019 and made a climate pledge for 2022:

Reducing emissions per job by 22% by 2022. Reducing emissions per resident by 15% by 2022. Reducing emissions per daily road movement by 15% by 2022.

Perhaps they would have done better to focus on the day job.

A little over a month ago, the Guardian was reportingUK councils slashing services to meet £3.2bn budget shortfall”:

Libraries and children’s centres are closing and home pick-ups for young disabled people being cancelled as councils try to meet a £3.2bn budget shortfall next year…

…The trade union Unison collected data from 391 councils, compiled through freedom of information requests and financial statements, and found that almost nine in 10 have a predicted budget gap in the 2023/24 financial year.

We are told that Birmingham City Council shows the biggest budget shortfall (£80 million) next year. So I thought I’d see what they’ve been up to. Well, there’s this:

In 2019 Birmingham City Council set its own target for the city, aiming to achieve net zero by 2030. This ambitious target aims to speed up Birmingham’s transition to net zero and send a clear message about the council’s commitment to a sustainable future.

And this:

Birmingham City Council is investing £27 million to retrofit 300 homes.

By my maths, that’s £90,000 per home, which doesn’t sound like great value. Still, never mind:

Birmingham City Council Leader Cllr Ian Ward…said: “Retrofitting homes across Birmingham is of course a key part of our route to zero carbon emissions but also a huge opportunity to create green jobs and tackle fuel poverty across the city.

No doubt the show will go on, since:

On 11 June 2019 the council declared a climate emergency and made a commitment to reduce the city’s carbon emissions and limit the climate crisis. As part of this declaration, an ambitious target was set for ‘the council and city to become net zero carbon by 2030, or as soon as possible thereafter as a just transition allows’, going beyond the Government’s own net zero by 2050 target.

The hubris regarding these declarations is constant. In reality, no Council, any Council, even one covering a city as large as Birmingham, could “limit the climate crisis” (sic). Still, reality never seems to stop them.

Meanwhile, who could forget this?

Nottingham City Council cuts after energy firm loses millions

A council which is making £12.5m in cuts poured millions of pounds into a loss-making energy firm, a report has found.

Nottingham City Council set up the not-for-profit Robin Hood Energy in 2015 to try to provide cheaper energy.

But by March 2019, the company had lost £34.4m despite large loans from the authority, external auditors Grant Thornton said.

The leader of the council admitted there were failings in its governance.

It comes as the council faces the impact of the coronavirus crisis, with 150 job cuts and the closure of a day centre for people with disabilities proposed last month in a bid to save £12.5m.

Needless to say, despite those job cuts and the proposed closure of a centre for people with disabilities, the net zero show must go on:

The Carbon Neutral Action Plan sets out high-level objectives to achieve a resilient and sustainable carbon-neutral Nottingham by 2028 (CN28).

The Plan itself runs to sixty pages, and although it rightly tells us that “[k]ey to implementing many of the actions to achieve the target will be the funding”, nowhere in the Plan can I find a reference to a single costing. Presumably there’s a budget somewhere for all this (some of which, admittedly, makes sense), but shouldn’t it have been included in the sixty page glossy plan?

Conclusion

As always, correlation is not causation. Perhaps Councils up and down the country would not be facing financial difficulties were it not for things like the long arm of the coronavirus pandemic and the financial costs that accompanied it; cuts in central government funding; increased energy costs, and much else besides. Nevertheless, when times are tough, the frivolous stuff should be the first to go (especially given that Councils aren’t legally obliged to pursue Net Zero agendas). And given that the UK contributes only 1% of global greenhouse gas emissions on an ongoing basis, given that Councils can in reality do very little to influence even that 1%, and given that the UK doesn’t face a climate emergency, the net zero agenda should be the first to go, so that the long-suffering British public doesn’t have to suffer cuts to vital services that really make a difference to their lives.

Sadly, I fear that reality isn’t likely to dawn any time soon.

86 Comments

  1. Retrofitting 300 homes eh? I’m not very clever but when I have driven through Birmingham it looks to me that the council will have rather more than 300 homes to deal with over the next 7 years.

    Like

  2. Herefordshire Council:

    Declared a climate emergency on 8th March 2019. [1]
    Have produced a Carbon Management Plan. [2]
    Spent £70,000 on a local Climate Assembly. [3]
    And now, with elections pending next year, they’ve launched their Masterplan. [4]

    Unveiled at a briefing for invited guests only, details are presently in short supply. Some clues, however, are to be found in the news report images; one of which being the desire to enhance Hereford’s historic centre. How ironic, then, that the briefing took place at the city’s Town Hall – one of the two major public buildings that are in urgent need of repair, but for which there is no money. [5]

    It get’s better though. Outside of the Town Hall lies St Owens St. which is presently undergoing works to incorporate a contraflow cycle lane – at a cost of over £1,000,000. [6]

    Apparently Cllr. John Harrington, cabinet member responsible for infrastructure and transport, appears to believe if cycle tracks are built people will simply get out of their cars and ride rather than drive:

    “So when the council decided to axe the western bypass it started to look at different ideas. He makes these points:

    * The council wants to improve bus services
    * Improve school transport
    * 40 per cent of people in the city travel less than 1.2 miles a day by car, partly by habit, and partly because there’s not a nice cycle route to go on. If the council can make it more attractive for people to travel a different way it will free capacity on the roads.”

    I cannot help but wonder, though, if freeing capacity on the roads will merely encourage more through traffic.

    [1] https://www.herefordshire.gov.uk/climate-2/climate-change
    [2] https://www.herefordshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/20530/carbon-management-plan-2020-21-to-2025-26
    [3] https://www.herefordshire.gov.uk/council/citizens-assembly
    [4] https://www.herefordtimes.com/news/23164251.live-updates-masterplan-will-change-face-hereford/
    [5] https://www.herefordtimes.com/news/23153828.we-dont-money-restore-herefords-shirehall/
    [6] https://www.herefordtimes.com/news/23130818.cost-hereford-street-cycle-plan-jumps-1m/#comments-anchor

    Liked by 1 person

  3. “Cheltenham council considering new district heat networks”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-63821453

    The alarming part of this story isn’t the idea that the Council is considering new district heat networks – done right it sounds like a good idea, so long as it’s economically viable and the Council don’t make a hash of it (two major provisos):

    The authority says it is interested in recycling wasted heat generated from mechanical processes including factories or commercial kitchens.

    Of course, the UK taxpayer has to shell out just to see if it’s a runner:

    It has applied for government funding to carry out feasibility studies.

    One of the things that bothers me is the waste and obsession around climate change:

    Cheltenham Borough Council’s cabinet member for climate emergency, Alisha Lewis, said heat networks could make up part of the authority’s plan to become carbon neutral by 2030.

    And:

    While Cheltenham’s plans are many years away from breaking ground, Mr Dudd had this advice for any future scheme.

    “It can be disruptive when the installation is happening, because you have to dig up the roads to put the networks of pipes in – and nobody likes roadworks.”

    Mr Dudd is Bristol City Council’s “cabinet member for waste, energy, climate change and ecology”.

    Like

  4. When reading items like this that demonstrates a link between two different activities (in this case council activities towards Net Zero and declines in other budgets) by providing multiple examples of that link but which never claim there are no counter examples, I do wonder if the link is a perfect one. Are some councils only paying lip service to Net Zero? I do, however, suppose that if there were such councils, that the green mob would be all over them like a green rash.

    Like

  5. Alan,

    My argument is not that net zero council policies are the sole cause of their budgetary constraints – far from it

    However, I do argue that when times are hard (and even when they are not), net zero policies represent frivolous and pointless virtue-signalling, distracting from more serious issues, and siphoning off limited funds that could and should be much better spent.

    It is always possible that some net zero policies might make life better for local people and/or be financially justified by savings generated as a result of the expenditure in question. However, such policies should stand or fall on their own merits. Given that no council can usefully do anything to “tackle” climate change, expenditure pursuing such an aim at the cost of local taxpayers strikes me as a dereliction of duty as a minimum, and arguably as an active breach of duty.

    Like

  6. Mark,

    This is a difficult one to judge. I’ve just taken a look at my regional council’s climate strategy and action plan documents and they are both high on arm waving and low on financial detail. Proposed actions are listed but there is no explanation as to how those actions will individually contribute towards, or collectively achieve, the stated net zero target. It just looks like sentiment and wishful thinking.

    Like

  7. John, I agree, of course.

    The problem is that sometimes sentiment, wishful thinking and arm waving come with a price tag attached, even if it’s only the cost of the consultants who draft the (often glossy) net zero “plan”, and even if the Councils themselves don’t bother to itemise and understand the costs associated with it all.

    Arm waving, without more, is a bit annoying, but so long as that’s all it is, I wouldn’t be too upset. The problem is that in some Council areas, a lot of this stuff costs a lot of money (and, as in the cases I mentioned in the article, can backfire spectacularly). Worrying about climate change isn’t a core Council obligation. In fact, so far as I am aware, it isn’t a Council obligation at all. They have lots of statutory duties (sometimes I think there are too many, and that central government expects too much, with limited funding), and they would do better to concentrate on those, IMO.

    Like

  8. Here are the Tyndall Centre’s recommendations for emissions cuts for Lincoln:

    1. Stay within a maximum cumulative carbon dioxide emissions budget of 2.3 million tonnes (MtCO2) for the period of 2020 to 2100. At 2017 CO2 emission levels, Lincoln would use this entire budget within 7 years from 2020.
    2. Initiate an immediate programme of CO2 mitigation to deliver cuts in emissions averaging a minimum of -12.7% per year to deliver a Paris aligned carbon budget. These annual reductions in emissions require national and local action, and could be part of a wider collaboration with other local authorities.
    3. Reach zero or near zero carbon no later than 2042. This report provides an indicative CO2 reduction pathway that stays within the recommended maximum carbon budget of 2.3 MtCO2. At 2042 5% of the budget remains. This represents very low levels of residual CO2 emissions by this time, or the Authority may opt to forgo these residual emissions and cut emissions to zero at this point. Earlier years for reaching zero CO2 emissions are also within the recommended budget, provided that interim budgets with lower cumulative CO2 emissions are also adopted.

    https://carbonbudget.manchester.ac.uk/reports/E07000138/
    Sounds pretty easy to me. Dunno what you’re moaning about Mark!

    What Tyndall seem to have done is just manufactured automatic reports based on a few simple inputs – existing population and per-capita emissions, that sort of thing. Should anyone wish to investigate Tyndall’s recommended pathways for their own local authorities, you can browse the reports at: https://carbonbudget.manchester.ac.uk/reports/

    [Your browser might tell you that Tyndall’s security certificate has expired.]

    I first encountered these reports when looking at Norwich’s “pathway.” What do Tyndall recommend? Cuts of 12.7% per year, exactly the same as Lincoln. But Norwich gets an extra year of grace: we have to achieve Net Zero by 2043, a year after Lincoln.

    Like

  9. Norwich’s carbon footprint report for 2020-21 is available here: https://www.norwich.gov.uk/info/20508/get_involved/1604/carbon_footprint

    It contains this disgraceful assertion:

    Fourth full year of the council’s OFGEM certified Green Tariff for electricity supplied to all council assets. Since 1 October 2016 all the electricity supplied to council assets has been sourced from renewable sources.

    Norwich seems to have done rather well in the period – a decline in emissions of about 25%. Of course, this was lockdown city, and they are deleting rather a large chunk of their electricity via this “Green Tariff”.

    Like

  10. Mark,

    >”…even if it’s only the cost of the consultants who draft the (often glossy) net zero ‘plan’…”

    They should have asked me. I could have written my council’s plan and strategy documents in about half a day and my rates are very reasonable.

    Like

  11. “Council chiefs warn of job losses and cuts to vital services without extra cash
    Job losses in councils are “inevitable” and services will be cut unless extra cash can be found to meet a £1 billion shortfall, local authority leaders have warned.”

    https://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/council-chiefs-warn-of-job-losses-and-cuts-to-vital-services-without-extra-cash-3941292

    Cosla, which represents Scotland’s councils, fears without additional cash from the Scottish Government, authorities will be “struggling to deliver even the basic, essential services that communities rely on”.

    Its president Shona Morrison warned that current Government spending plans could see council services “either significantly reduced, cut, or stopped altogether”.

    She was speaking as the organisation, which represents Scotland’s 32 local authorities, issued an “SOS call” to “save our services”…

    …Finance directors from all 32 Scottish local authorities have already written an “unprecedented” letter to Mr John Swinney to highlight their “immediate concerns”.

    Mr Heddle warned: “What we will now face is councils struggling to deliver even the basic, essential services that communities rely on.

    Cosla resources spokeswoman Katie Hagmann said councils “are at a crisis point like never before”…

    I will watch with interest to see if net zero plans remain unaffected, while basic services are significantly reduced, cut, or even stopped altogether.

    Like

  12. “Oxford County Councillors to Introduce Trial Climate Lockdown in 2024”

    https://dailysceptic.org/2022/12/05/oxford-county-councillors-to-introduce-trial-climate-lockdown-in-2024/

    Oxfordshire County Council Pass Climate Lockdown ‘trial’ to Begin in 2024

    Oxfordshire County Council yesterday approved plans to lock residents into one of six zones to ‘save the planet’ from global warming. The latest stage in the ’15 minute city’ agenda is to place electronic gates on key roads in and out of the city, confining residents to their own neighbourhoods.

    Under the new scheme if residents want to leave their zone they will need permission from the Council who gets to decide who is worthy of freedom and who isn’t. Under the new scheme residents will be allowed to leave their zone a maximum of 100 days per year, but in order to even gain this every resident will have to register their car details with the council who will then track their movements via smart cameras round the city.

    Communism will make the weather better

    Oxfordshire County Council, which is run by Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party, secretly decided to divide-up the city of Oxford into six ‘15 minute’ districts in 2021 soon after they were elected to office. None of the councillors declared their intention of imprisoning local residents in their manifestos of course, preferring to make vague claims about how they will ‘improve the environment’ instead.

    Every resident will be required to register their car with the County Council who will then monitor how many times they leave their district via number plate recognition cameras. And don’t think you can beat the system if you’re a two car household. Those two cars will be counted as one meaning you will have to divide up the journeys between yourselves. 2 cars 50 journeys each; 3 cars 33 journeys each and so on.

    It does appear on the Council website, where the euphemistic term “traffic filters” is adopted:

    https://www.oxford.gov.uk/news/article/2250/proposals_to_trial_six_new_traffic_filters_in_oxford_announced

    Traffic filters are designed to reduce traffic, make bus journeys faster and make walking and cycling safer.

    Sounds great, But the reality is still that Big Brother is watching you, and if you use your car too much, you will be fined:

    The scheme will be enforced using automatic number plate recognition cameras.

    When they are operating, private cars will not be allowed through the traffic filters without a permit….

    …Residents in Oxford and some areas just outside the city will be able to apply for a permit to drive through the traffic filters for up to 100 days per year.

    Like

  13. “False climate lockdown claims in Oxford lead to death threats”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-64001776

    False claims that a lockdown to help fight climate change could soon be enforced in Oxford have spread on social media.

    The BBC Climate Disinformation Specialist, Marco Silva, is at it again. It’s true that the Oxford plan is going to go forward only as a trial, at least to begin with. But it is also true that it is to be introduced because of climate concerns (and possibly in an attempt to reduce pollution), as part of the Council’s commitment to net zero. It is also true that people will be fined if they use their cars too much when travelling around the city, and that Big Brother will be watching them. And without a single bit of fact-checking (at least none that appears in the article), Marco gives us this:

    Several councillors suspect the “climate lockdown” conspiracy is being pushed by groups from outside the county.

    “It’s an organised sort of group of climate change deniers,” said Ms Kerr.

    The BBC has seen evidence that protests against the supposed “climate lockdown” in Oxford are being planned in 2023. Promotional material has been shared online by groups known for spreading conspiracy theories, including about Covid-19 and vaccines.

    Early in the article, we are old this:

    “It’s not a lockdown,” said Liz Leffman, leader of Oxfordshire County Council. “People are going to be free to travel around, just as they are at the moment.”

    The article ends with this:

    “This is going to happen in other parts of the country, because I don’t think we’re going to be the only city that will make the decision to limit traffic.”

    Those two quotes strike me as mutually contradictory. And OK, it’s not a “lockdown” of the sort we had during the covid lockdowns, but then it’s a term being used in a loose way to describe the plans to limit our freedom to travel where we want, when we want, how we want – and such plans are there, however Marco might seek to spin it. In this sense, what’s the difference between using “climate lockdown” and “climate crisis”? Both are exaggerations, designed to grab attention, but only one gets the climate disinformation treatment.

    Like

  14. seems a “nudge” is not enough, so they are moving to “cattle prod” next.

    Like

  15. “Cannock climate target watered down in face of £4bn cost”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-64187288

    A council’s target to become carbon neutral by the end of the decade is being altered after it was revealed it would cost over £4bn.

    In 2019 Cannock Chase District Council made the pledge as part of its declaration of climate emergency.

    But a costed action plan says it would require £4.7bn in capital investment to meet the target.

    The local authority said the Covid-19 pandemic and current cost of living crisis had affected its plans.

    The Local Democracy Reporting Service said a report, produced by consultants AECOM, estimated the district as a whole produced the equivalent of 361,200,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide each year.

    Cannock Chase District Council is itself responsible for a small proportion of this – 2,521,000 tonnes, or less than 1%.

    The local authority’s revised target would see it become carbon neutral by 2030, rather than a district-wide goal…

    This story is important at so many levels. One modest-sized council – a cost of £4.7Bn. Understanding that councils themselves are directly responsible for a small amount of an area’s emissions, and that council carbon neutrality is just meaningless (but expensive) virtue-signalling. Continuing hubris, inasmuch as although it’s clear that the Council’s net zero plans are a drop in the ocean, nevertheless they will (pointlessly) plough on regardless. I wonder what the consultants’ report cost? I suppose in its favour, it seems to have prevented the council from wasting £4.7Bn, though they appear to be determined to waste a smaller sum on an exercise in futility.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. PS did anyone spot the BBC’s sleight of hand with numbers again? As Jit and I have mentioned regarding 2022 EV sales, the BBC managed to convert one-sixth in to almost one-fifth, presumably because it suited the BBC agenda of bigging up EV sales. But the report saying that carbon neutrality would cost £4.7Bn is magically described in the headline as £4Bn. Come on BBC – for the sake of consistency, surely that has to be “nearly £5Bn”?!!!

    Liked by 1 person

  17. This isn’t a story about wasting money, but it does illustrate the nihilistic tendencies and moves to ban things in some quarters including, it would seem, councils:

    “Climate hactivists subvert Bristol Billboards with spoof ads”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-64264251

    Is the picture of a BMW on fire an electric one?

    …Several councils in the UK, including Cambridgeshire, Norwich and North Somerset, have introduced restrictions on advertising for environmentally-damaging products, such as fossil fuel companies, flights and SUV cars.

    Despite Bristol City Council banning advertising for unhealthy food, alcohol and gambling, it has yet to introduce similar restrictions on “high carbon” advertising….

    Like

  18. “More net zero help needed for councils, warn MSPs”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-64366541

    Scotland’s climate change targets could be missed unless local government is given more support, a Holyrood committee has warned.

    The net zero, energy and transport committee said councils were best placed to achieve climate goals.

    But it said they needed more help to access funding and skills amid ongoing financial pressures….

    …Environment and economy spokeswoman Gail Macgregor said: “Local government is committed, locally and nationally, to leading the net zero transition.

    “But Cosla has been open that local authorities can’t do that effectively without the increased support of Scottish government.”

    The Scottish government said it would continue to work closely with local authorities on reaching climate goals.

    “In 2023-24, we are increasing the resources available to local government by over £570m, a real terms increase of £160.6m or 1.3%,” a spokesperson said.

    They added that private investment was critical to achieving net zero and said the government would try to provide more leverage in securing such funding.

    Like

  19. “Thousands of free trees to be given away”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3gd0q77k0lo

    Thousand of trees are to be given away by a council to boost the local environment and help tackle climate change.

    Bedford Borough Council said residents could take up to five each and businesses, community groups and schools could collect up to 25.

    A selection of native broadleaf trees including oaks, dogwoods and shrubs will be handed out.

    Dave Hodgson, the Liberal Democrat elected mayor, said: “Planting these 5,000 trees will provide a boost to our local environment, from increasing biodiversity to helping to tackle climate change.”

    Perhaps it’s a nice idea, in principle. We aren’t told what it will cost, nor whether any helpful advice will be given to recipients to ensure that the right trees are planted in the best locations and to ensure they are looked after and not simply abandoned to die.

    Like

  20. “Oldham Council to spend £1.35m on Failsworth solar farm”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-64413524

    A council is set to spend £1.35m on a solar farm that is hoped will reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 50 tonnes a year and cut energy bills.

    Oldham Council signed off the 2018 plan to install 2,700 solar panels in Failsworth.

    The plan was paused in 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic after it was argued forecasted low energy prices meant the farm had “no viable business case”….

    …Councillor Abdul Jabbar, deputy leader and cabinet member for finance and low carbon, said he was “excited” by the project, which would see panels installed on a currently disused site….

    That would be the same Councillor Jabbar who is quoted here:

    “Oldham Labour blame budget cuts for council tax rises
    15th December 2022”

    https://www.theoldhamtimes.co.uk/news/23186004.oldham-labour-blame-budget-cuts-council-tax-rises/

    Cllr Jabbar added that the cuts and council tax rises have led to an “abhorrent situation where the council runs less [sic] services despite increasing council tax”.

    “This is not sustainable”, he said.

    “Council tax needs urgent reform – even Michael Gove says it is regressive, meaning poorer people pay more than they should – and we need long-term financial information to help us plan properly”, Cllr Jabbar added….

    Hey ho.

    Like

  21. 50 tonnes of CO2 saving? Seems a little low even for solar panels, what with the per-capita annual emissions in the UK about 6 t CO2. That means you’re spending a mil to reduce your population by 8 and a bit.

    Like

  22. “Surrey council on brink of insolvency with debts of nearly £2bn
    Woking says it is at risk of issuing section 114 notice, which would force central government to intervene”

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/feb/21/woking-surrey-council-brink-insolvency-debts-2bn

    A local council in Surrey has signalled it is close to effective bankruptcy after amassing debts worth almost £2bn to fund a property investment spree, raising fresh questions over the fragile health of local authorities after years of austerity.

    Woking borough council said it was “in the territory” of being unable to meet its financial obligations, amid a surge in debt interest costs on its investments, which include a shopping centre, residential skyscrapers and 23-storey Hilton hotel.

    The council, one of several in England with big debt problems, said it was at risk of issuing a section 114 notice, which effectively signals insolvency. Although councils cannot technically go bankrupt, a section 114 is able to force central government to intervene to ensure local services are sustainable.

    The process is seen as an admission by an authority that it lacks the resources to meet current expenditure, that its reserves are depleted and that it has little confidence it can bring its finances under control in the near future…

    That would be this Woking Borough Council:

    “Climate Emergency Action Plan: Progress Update 11 – September to November 2022”

    Click to access Climate%20Emergency%20Action%20Plan%20Update%20November%202022.pdf

    In summer 2022, officers in Green Infrastructure commissioned Anthesis to undertake
    an independent carbon footprint assessment of the Council’s corporate emissions. The
    assessment is complete with results to be disseminated shortly.

    I wonder that cost?

    Like

  23. “Croydon and Thurrock councils put into special measures
    Government-appointed managers will take over day-to-day running after authorities fell into effective bankruptcy”

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/mar/17/croydon-and-thurrock-councils-put-into-special-measures

    As well as Croydon and Thurrock, Slough also receives a dishonourable mention:

    The local government minister, Lee Rowley, also raised concerns about the post-bankruptcy progress of a third council, Slough, which he said showed “an unacceptable lack of urgency and focus … to resolve the situation it has placed itself in”.

    Croydon Council:

    “CROYDON CARBON NEUTRAL ACTION PLAN”

    Click to access croydon-carbon-neutral-action-plan.pdf

    Since declaring a climate and ecological emergency in 2019, I am proud to mention that we have taken a wide range of actions to combat climate change, including; planting thousands of trees, installing hundreds of electric vehicle charges points, working on fuel poverty, installing renewable heat solutions in council housing blocks, developing dozens of school streets, recycling more waste and encouraging circular economy principles, encouraging walking and cycling and improving air quality by implementing more cycle routes and healthy streets and neighbourhoods schemes. Climate change requirements have also been embedded in Croydon’s updated Local Plan to ensure sustainable design and construction of new buildings along with protecting and enhancing our green spaces.

    The challenge is significant and on its own, the Council cannot achieve the scale of change required in the borough. It will therefore develop a communication and engagement strategy to raise awareness and build a broad alliance of partners to deliver on the actions outlined in the Croydon Carbon Neutral Action Plan. This will involve working with residents, unions, businesses, civil society organisations, further education and skills providers, and other anchor organisations.

    This carbon neutral action plan outlines various key initiatives that are either being delivered or will be delivered over the coming years to put Croydon on the path of carbon neutrality by 2030. It is our ambition to embed climate change into everything we do as a council and that no area of the council will be left unchallenged.

    And a quick reminder about Thurrock:

    “Thurrock council admits disastrous investments caused £500m deficit”

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/nov/29/thurrock-council-admits-disastrous-investments-caused-500m-deficit

    Thurrock had become one of the most indebted of all English local authorities in recent years after borrowing £1.5bn – 10 times its annual spending on local services – to enable a string of investments in solar energy and other businesses.

    And Slough:

    “Climate change
    Climate change and carbon management”

    https://www.slough.gov.uk/strategies-plans-policies/climate-change

    Its key priorities are to:

    Reduce CO2 emissions from energy consumption across all Council operations
    Reduce energy consumption revenue costs across all Council operations
    Embed carbon management in the Council’s policies and procedures
    Raise awareness of carbon management among staff through the Environmental Strategic Board to reduce carbon emissions and energy consumption
    Incorporate high standards of energy efficiency into new buildings, equipment and contracts
    Key actions – Incorporate carbon intensity into the procurement of goods and services

    Meanwhile, every page of the Slough Council website (including the above one) seems to be headed with a banner message to the effect that:

    Delay in customer service
    Our lines are busy and calls may take longer to answer. Please search our site to help you. You can make payments online or call the automated payment line 01753 475 111 and select option 0.

    Priorities, eh?

    Like

  24. “Glasgow cuts £22m from health and social care services”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-65038555

    Glasgow’s Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP) has revealed budget cuts of nearly £22m.

    The Integration Joint Board – which administers social care, addiction and homelessness services – approved the cuts, including the loss of 197 full-time equivalent posts.

    The partnership said it had worked to produce a “balanced budget” that “minimises the impact on services”.

    The GMB union warned it would have a “devastating” affect on service users.

    Funding for self-directed support, which allows disabled people to organise their own package of care, is to be slashed by £2.3m….

    We never hear about cuts to net zero plans and budgets, though. Glasgow Council devotes a significant section to its net zero plans, including this glossy report running to more than 180 pages:

    https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/councillorsandcommittees/viewDoc.asp?c=P62AFQDNDXUTT181NT

    It doesn’t anywhere mention the cost, but in the run-up to COP26 in Glasgow, they did put this page and headline on their website:

    “Glasgow launches £30bn ‘Greenprint for Investment’, a portfolio of transformative climate investment projects to boost 2030 Net-Zero goal”

    https://www.glasgow.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=27563

    Glasgow, a city with some of the worst health outcomes in Europe, splurging £30Bn on net zero while cutting £22M from health and social care services. Priorities, eh?

    Like

  25. Surrey County Council next:

    “Consultant leading Surrey County Council’s £30m jump to new ERP system will bag £177,000 as £83m cuts bite local citizens”

    https://www.theregister.com/2020/10/06/surrey_county_council_erp_replacement/

    In February 2019, Surrey County Council approved budget cuts of £82m for 2019/2020 including the closure of 31 children’s centres.

    That was four short years ago. Meanwhile, today’s news:

    “Surrey to install thousands of electric vehicle chargers”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-65013735

    …A total of 10,000 devices will be installed at 1,500 locations across the county by 2030…

    …Surrey Country Council said the move towards electric vehicles was part of the authority’s commitment to becoming a carbon net zero county by 2050.

    Matt Furniss, cabinet member for transport, infrastructure and growth, added: “High-quality, reliable, and accessible charging infrastructure is critical to accelerating the uptake of electric vehicles across the county and serving the needs of all our local communities.”

    The rollout is being overseen by a partnership between Surrey County Council and Connected Kerb, a charging point provider…

    Funnily enough, we aren’t told what it is costing.

    Like

  26. “Council spends £1.4m to cut carbon emissions at Buxton Pool”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-65070867

    Work is due to start on a £1.4m project to cut a swimming pool’s carbon emissions.

    High Peak Borough Council said it had secured £1.29m, which it was supplementing with its own money, for the project at Buxton Swimming Pool and Fitness Centre.

    It hoped to replace the conventional gas boilers with air source heat pumps and solar panels.

    It said it believed this would save around 200 tonnes of CO2 every year.

    That would be this High Peak Council:

    “Council cuts £51,000 in grant funding to High Peak parish councils
    High Peak Borough Council is cutting £51,000 in grant funding to parish councils across the borough due to a “black hole” in its finances.”

    https://www.buxtonadvertiser.co.uk/news/politics/council-cuts-ps51000-in-grant-funding-to-high-peak-parish-councils-3152045

    Like

  27. “North Yorkshire Council to make EV charging points available to all”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-65388112

    Electric vehicle charging points will be made available to all residents, North Yorkshire Council has pledged.

    Announcing a new strategy to boost electric vehicle usage, leaders said an enhanced network of charging points was key – despite challenges caused by the county’s terrain.

    The council’s executive will meet on 2 May to consider the findings of a public consultation.

    It has already secured £2.2m in funding for 70 charge points …

    …According to the council, there are almost 4,000 electric vehicles registered in North Yorkshire and 225 publicly available charge points.

    It is predicted 724 chargers will be needed by 2025, and 3,161 charge points by 2030. Half will need to be funded by the public sector at a cost of £10.3 million, the council said.

    That would be this North Yorkshire Council:

    “North Yorkshire Council warns of cuts amid £30 million shortfall”

    https://thestrayferret.co.uk/north-yorkshire-council-to-face-30-million-shortfall/

    The new North Yorkshire Council is set to face a £30 million shortfall in its first year, despite increased funding from government.

    Michael Gove, Levelling Up Secretary, unveiled £60 billion worth of funding for councils across the UK on Monday — a 9% increase on last year.

    The council is set to receive an additional £22 million from government as part of the announcement.

    However, soaring inflation and the impact of the covid pandemic is still set to leave a blackhole in the authority’s finances.

    A council press release said the shortfall would be met “by the one-off use of reserves as well as some savings”.

    Cllr Carl Les, Conservative leader of the council, said:

    “We are faced with the biggest financial pressures which I have witnessed in all of the time I have been a member of the county council since I was elected more than 20 years ago.

    “While the extra funding from the government is extremely welcome, it will still not be enough to alleviate the extraordinary challenges which we do need to tackle in the coming financial year.

    “The pressure on budgets will be felt across all of the directorates which provide key services for the hundreds of thousands of people who live and work in North Yorkshire…”

    Like

  28. “Aberdeen City Council offers £40K for Climate Change Officer job”

    https://www.energyvoice.com/renewables-energy-transition/499762/aberdeen-city-council-offers-40k-for-climate-change-officer-job/

    Aberdeen City Council has posted a job ad for a Climate Change Officer role with a salary of over £40,000 per year.

    The local authority is seeking an applicant who can embed “robust sustainability and climate change principles and practices across the Council.”

    The wage for this role begins at £36,864 and caps out at £41,847 per year.

    The job description says that the person who secures the role will focus on collaborating with other offices, councillors, stakeholders, and constituents to ensure compliance with legislation such as the Climate Change (Scotland) Acts.

    This position will see the successful candidate working in “a globally leading Energy City” and the role will help see Aberdeen “on its own critical journey of just transition towards Net Zero emissions, climate resilience and nature recovery.”

    Aberdeen City Council is seeking someone to deliver “critical parts” of the region’s journey to zero emissions.

    That would be this Aberdeen Council:

    “Aberdeen budget: Why council tax is going up and harsh cuts could become a reality”

    https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/aberdeen-aberdeenshire/5434003/aberdeen-budget-explained/

    Councillors will have to weigh up a perfect storm of financial challenges as they find ways to cut £46.6 million in year-on-year spending.

    To achieve this, city accountants have pressed for a 10% increase in council tax from April.

    But the body’s largest political group, the SNP, ruled out the step after The Press And Journal exclusively revealed the eye-watering hike was under consideration.

    But this could be a double-edged sword…

    In protecting residents from the steep jump in council tax bills, councillors could be left slashing spending on some important services…

    Like

  29. Kent Council’s net zero plans and activities are pretty extensive. They don’t, however, come cheap (albeit the Council seems a bit vague about the total cost):

    Click to access Report.pdf

    Section 5.1 (Financial Implications):

    When establishing the basis to set the KCC estate’s Net Zero target, modelling by LASER Energy Management completed in 2020, estimated that investment in the region of £27m will be needed to enable KCC to meet the Net Zero target for its own estate by 2030. These costs are being updated over time as we gain more certainty about KCC’s future estate plans and opportunities presented by new technologies, and to factor in the changes in energy costs and those of new technologies, which will also change as they become the norm.

    Meanwhile:

    “Kent waste centres face closure to save costs”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg35p3ep1wgo

    Kent County Council is considering plans to close up to four household waste sites to save money

    The authority says it needs to save £55m or risk bankruptcy

    Dartford Borough Council’s leader has called the plans “not very green”

    Like

  30. “Highland Council looks at generating its own power”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-65707730

    Highland Council is exploring the potential of generating and storing its own power.

    The local authority believes solar and battery storage could bring widespread benefits to communities, and help it achieve climate change targets.

    Benefits also include the creation of work for local suppliers.

    But in a report to councillors meeting next week, officials said developing and managing renewables projects would require major investment.

    A council workshop held last month discussed the possibility of the local authority developing its own renewable projects, including wind, geothermal and tidal…

    That would be this Highland Council:

    “Highland Council budget: Cuts to children’s charities squeak through, as roads investment and 4% council tax rise agreed”

    https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/news/highlands-islands/5456554/highland-council-budget-agreed-2023-council-tax-charity-cut/

    Cuts to a number of children’s charities and arts group were pushed through as Highland Council agreed a new budget during a tense meeting today.

    The local authority’s administration revealed earlier this week that it needs to plug a £49m gap to balance the books.

    Among its plans was a funding cut to a number of early years groups, as well as several arts, culture, sports, music and community organisations.

    An amendment to reverse those cuts from Inverness councillor Isabelle MacKenzie said the decision would have a “disproportionate impact on vulnerable and disabled children, as well as low-income families”.

    However, that amendment was defeated by 39 votes to 33.

    A raft of other cost-cutting proposals were agreed during the meeting, including a 4% rise in council tax.

    Council leader Raymond Bremner started the meeting by saying it had been “one of the toughest years” to try to set a budget.

    He said: “It’s just been a perfect storm.

    “Inflation is at one of its highest levels. We are in the middle of a cost-of-living crisis and our communities face considerable fuel cost increases.

    “Our communities told us they wanted their roads fixed and that they wanted the council to be more contactable.

    “We had to look at trying to close a gap of almost £50m. As well as facing the challenge of meeting the requests of our Highland communities.”

    There was no argument from anyone about the severity of the situation….

    Like

  31. “More than 600 Glasgow City Council vehicles not LEZ compliant”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-65861870

    Glasgow City Council is having to hire vehicles because some of its own fleet does not meet new rules on emissions.

    More than 600 of its vehicles are not allowed inside the city’s Low Emission Zone (LEZ) introduced last week…

    …Of the 1,615 vehicles owned by Glasgow City council, 616 are non-compliant meaning they are no longer allowed inside the council’s new LEZ…

    …Among the non-complaint [sic] vehicles is a limousine used to by the council’s Lord Provost, according to the Scottish Daily Express.

    The LEZ covers an area from the M8 motorway to the north and west of Glasgow, the River Clyde to the south, and the Saltmarket/High Street to the east…

    …Speaking on BBC Scotland’s Drivetime, Chris Mitchell from the GMB union said the council “should have thought of this a long time ago”.

    Mr Mitchell, who works as a refuse collector for the council said: “The majority of the vehicles I deal with are non-complaint for the LEZ because they are the best part of 15 years old and obviously we still need to provide a service within the city centre.

    “Unfortunately they’ve had to hire in a number of vehicles at a pretty penny, at a cost to the council – well, at a cost to the taxpayer.”

    Mr Mitchell said the types of vehicles being hired were “small flat-bed” vehicles, used for collecting rubbish…

    I suspect that what follows is more than a little bit of an exaggeration. Nevertheless, it’s another example of things not being thought through:

    “Homeless charity says lives will be lost after Glasgow LEZ vans ban”

    https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23580150.lez-charity-says-lives-will-lost-steps-attack-snp-depute/

    A CHARITY which feeds homeless people in Glasgow has warned lives will be lost as a result of three of its emergency outreach vehicles being banned from the city centre’s low emission zone.

    Colin McInnes, chairman and founder of Homeless Project Scotland, said his organisation had spent £16,000 on a fourth van, which can transport food in a cool environment, so that it could continue to feed hungry people.

    Mr McInnes said its other three vehicles which carry first aid equipment could not be driven into the city centre as they did not meet the requirements of the LEZ. His organisation has now launched a fund raising campaign to raise £80,000 for new replacement vans compliant with the emissions’ restrictions.

    “We would far rather be spending the money on food for people rather than on vehicles,” he told The Herald.

    “I know that lives will be lost when we are off the road. Drug overdose deaths will increase because we are not able to take our emergency outreach vehicles into the LEZ and more people will be hungry.”

    Mr McInnes wants an exemption for the charity’s vehicles which emergency vehicles have….

    Like

  32. “Orkney Council to spend £150k to dispose of £1 wave device”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-66248137

    A wave energy converter bought by Orkney Islands council for £1 is expected to cost £150k to decommission.

    The council purchased the Pelamis wave device in 2017 for a nominal sum in the hope of saving it from destruction, given its heritage value to the island.

    But it has failed to find a use for the 180m (591ft) long wave machine and is now looking to dispose of it.

    The council received £45,000 at the time for any disposal costs, but has spent almost all of it on maintenance.

    Gareth Waterson, the council’s director of enterprise, told BBC Radio Orkney: “Now is the time to get it decommissioned.

    “We’ve spent nearly as much as the £45,000 that we got in maintaining it. It has been a bit of an albatross.”

    The device was developed by the now defunct Pelamis Wave Power company, which went into administration in 2014. It was originally valued at £2m….

    …The council planned to preserve it as an artefact to mark ocean energy research and development in Orkney.

    But it found that the 1,350 tonne device would be too difficult to maintain as a display item.

    That would be this Orkney Council:

    “Orkney Islands council tax to increase by 10%”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-64751492

    Orkney Islands Council has backed a 10% rise in council tax from April.

    Councillors said they would also have to draw £17m from reserves to help run services over the next year.

    Charges for many services will also go up by 10%, as councillors warned it was the only way to protect vital areas from “significant cuts”.

    The local authority said it had seen increasing demand for services and faced rising costs – particularly for energy which had gone up by 15%….

    …”We hold reserves for a rainy day,” he explained during Thursday’s meeting. “As far as I’m concerned, it’s pouring.”…

    Liked by 1 person

  33. Mark – ““Orkney Council to spend £150k to dispose of £1 wave device”

    and no MSM report this – bet BBC pushed it at the time, but now nothing so far

    Like

  34. Dougie,

    In fairness, that report was by the BBC. The most I can criticise them for on this occasion is lack of criticism of the waste associated with renewable pipe dreams, but even that is arguably implicit in the article. Nothing in the Guardian though!

    Like

  35. “Wakefield schools to get solar panels to power classrooms”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-66322093

    Schools in Wakefield are to have solar panels installed to reduce their environmental impact.

    Up to 22 schools will have panels fitted on their roofs or in their grounds to enable classrooms to be powered by renewable energy.

    Wakefield Council said the £2m project could cut the city’s greenhouse gas output by 456 tonnes a year.

    The plans were approved by councillors at a cabinet meeting on Monday.

    Jack Hemingway, cabinet member for environment and climate change, told the meeting the “really positive” scheme would also provide funding for climate education for children at the schools….

    Remember that figure: £2 million.

    That would be this Wakefield Council:

    “Wakefield Council to hike tax and cut services to tackle £24m budget shortfall”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-64217348

    Wakefield Council is set to cut spending on services by £14m and raise council tax by 4.99% in a bid to plug a hole in its budget.

    Leisure centre and parking charges could also increase under plans to tackle the £24.7m funding shortfall…

    …The local authority said it planned to save £2m by cutting staff, including by scrapping vacant posts, and £700,000 by closing buildings and reducing energy use….

    Like

  36. The Guardian today:

    “‘The swings are missing’: Children in Newcastle left with nowhere to play
    Families worry about where their children will go during the summer as crumbling playgrounds are left in disrepair”

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/04/the-swings-are-missing-children-in-newcastle-left-with-nowhere-to-play

    …Newcastle council, like other local authorities, has faced years of sustained drops in central government funding. In March the council signed off a budget that involved £23m of cuts.

    A Guardian analysis of park spending across England shows that Newcastle council has reduced spending on parks by two-thirds in 10 years….

    That would be this Newcastle City Council:

    “Funding our Net Zero programme”

    https://newcastle.gov.uk/our-city/climate-change/net-zero-newcastle/funding-our-net-zero-programme

    …Our cost estimates of the scale of investment required to deliver Net Zero by 2030 is £375m….

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Mark,

    The irony here is that the environmentalists would tell you that all this redirection of funds is necessary to ensure that children have somewhere to play:

    Liked by 1 person

  38. Frome Town Council is one of many that has virtue-signalled by declaring a climate emergency:

    https://www.frometowncouncil.gov.uk/your-community/sustainability-and-resilience/climate-and-ecological-emergency/

    Perhaps it should concentrate on the real issues affecting local people instead, things that a Council might, just might, be able to influence (unlike the climate):

    “Frome declares housing crisis as rents soar out of reach”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-66463563

    A town has officially declared a housing crisis as rental rates soar out of the reach of local people.

    Frome Town Council has adopted the formal declaration to draw attention to the shortage of housing in the town….

    …So how has a small town in Somerset become such a housing hotspot, and what can they do about it?

    Some say Frome is a victim of its own success.

    The town is full of quirky, independent shops and cafes, artists and green businesses.

    There is a vibrant local market, full of artisan makers and food stalls.

    All this has attracted regular attention from national newspapers and magazines, which frequently declare Frome one of the best towns to live in the UK.

    It has led to many people moving from London to the Mendips….

    Well, that what was green, wasn’t it?

    By the way, when declaring a climate emergency, perhaps these councils should take note of the BBC’s words (perhaps the BBC should too!):

    …Declaring a crisis does not solve it of course…

    Like

  39. “The town is full of quirky, independent shops and cafes, artists and green businesses.

    It has led to many people moving from London to the Mendips.

    The town is also home to environmental charities and community benefit companies. People trying to live a different life by reducing their impact on the planet.”

    The Islington climate change jetset, who no doubt were thrilled when Frome Town Council declared a climate emergency, moved from the Big Smoke to the Mendips just so they could tackle the ‘climate emergency’ in more congenial surroundings. Unfortunately, they drove rents sky high and priced the locals out of the housing market. So what’s the solution?

    Summer Auty, the 24 year old budding artist come Marxist, who came to Frome from London and is living in her van, thinks she has the answer:

    “We need a complete redistribution of wealth, it’s awful all the big homes lying empty, all the land we cannot use,” she added.

    I bet she wouldn’t be saying that if she wasn’t living in a van and instead owned one of those big second homes.

    Like

  40. This really is a non-story, but not to the BBC. It isn’t languishing in a regional section of the BBC website. No, it’s a “Science & Environment” story:

    “Aylesbury woman refuses to pay council tax in climate protest”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-66500208

    What’s her problem? The Council banks with Barclays, which she blames for funding fossil fuels:

    A 72-year-old woman said she is refusing to pay council tax as a form of climate protest.

    Dr Jane McCarthy wants Buckinghamshire County Council to stop banking with Barclays due to its support of fossil fuels and switch its pension fund to low-carbon investments….

    It must be great for a single individual to be able to generate this amount of national publicity for their cause, via the national broadcaster. Still, it’s only likely to happen if the BBC approves of your protest. Meanwhile, what of Buckinghamshire Council?

    Well, it’s fully signed up to the agenda, but that’s not enough for some people:

    https://www.buckinghamshire.gov.uk/campaign/bucks-climate-challenge/

    Like

  41. “Black hole in town hall budgets rises to £5bn”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66428191

    A black hole in local authority budgets continues to grow, a BBC investigation reveals, prompting fears some will not be able to provide basic services.

    The average council now faces a £33m predicted deficit by 2025-26 – a rise of 60% from £20m two years ago.

    Unison said the situation meant some councils would not be able to offer the “legal minimum of care” next year.

    The government said decisions on the funding beyond the next financial year had not yet been made.

    The BBC’s Shared Data Unit surveyed 190 upper-tier authorities in the UK to find out the extent of the financial difficulties facing town halls, which provide services from adult social care to bin collections and pothole repairs.

    It revealed council chiefs expect to be £5.2bn short of balancing the books by April 2026 even after making £2.5bn of planned cuts.

    At least £467m will be stripped from adult care services, which include elderly care homes, respite centres and support services for people with disabilities.

    This year, councils are closing leisure centres, reducing care packages and raising fees for services like waste collection and parking in order to break even…

    A number of Councils are mentioned in the context of particular problems, such as this:

    …Gateshead Leisure Centre was opened in 1981 by Queen Elizabeth and featured a pool, a soft play and a gym, as well as badminton and basketball courts.

    But in November 2022, Gateshead Council recommended closing it, claiming it had no other choice “after government cuts”….

    That would be this Gateshead Council:

    Gateshead Leisure Centre was opened in 1981 by Queen Elizabeth and featured a pool, a soft play and a gym, as well as badminton and basketball courts.

    But in November 2022, Gateshead Council recommended closing it, claiming it had no other choice “after government cuts”.

    Bradford & Leicester Councils also earn a mention:

    …Bradford Council said the authority was using reserves at an “unprecedented level” while Leicester City Council said it was going to run out during the next financial year….

    These Councils, in other words:

    https://bradford.gov.uk/your-community/community-grants/bradford-district-community-climate-action-fund/

    https://www.leicestershire.gov.uk/environment-and-planning/net-zero

    Like

  42. “At least 26 English councils ‘at risk of bankruptcy in next two years’
    Research from body representing 47 authorities says many could follow Slough, Croydon, Thurrock and Woking into collapse”

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/aug/28/at-least-26-english-councils-at-risk-of-bankruptcy-in-next-two-years

    I’m not defending Government’s funding policy towards local authorities, but perhaps if Councils stopped wasting huge amounts of money on net zero policies, they might be in a much better place financially.

    Like

  43. Mark, aiui Government has been complicit in the funding arrangements which have led to these bankruptcies. Councils were allowed to borrow huge sums from the Public Works Loan Board (now defunct) which they used to speculate in commercial property, solar farms and such like. The aim was to derive extra revenue to top up their income from central government. So, I suspect, the govt turned a blind eye to this misuse of public funds.
    Of course it has all turned into a train wreck which is only going to get worse.

    Liked by 1 person

  44. “Vital services safe – leader of ‘bankrupt’ Birmingham council”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-66715441

    The leader of Birmingham City Council insisted vital services would be protected as the authority declared itself effectively bankrupt.

    The largest local authority in Europe is to halt all spending other than services it must provide by law such as social care, waste collections and protecting the vulnerable.

    The Labour-run council needs to settle a £760m bill for equal pay claims.

    Its leader John Cotton said “tough and robust decisions” would be made.

    There are fears cuts could affect roads, parks, libraries and cultural projects, while a question mark hangs over the council’s funding of the 2026 European Athletics Championships planned for the city’s Alexander Stadium.

    The council, which faces an immediate budget shortfall of £87m this year, has also blamed the implementation of its Oracle IT system for its desperate situation….

    That would be this Birmingham City Council:

    https://www.birmingham.gov.uk/info/50282/climate_change/2642/what_is_the_council_doing_about_climate_change

    Like

  45. It would appear that achieving carbon neutrality is harder than Councillors and officials assume:

    “Bristol City Council to miss 2025 carbon neutral target”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-66723203

    A city council is set to miss its 2025 carbon neutral target because it is still burning too much gas.

    Bristol City Council, which declared a “climate emergency” four years ago, is forecast to emit almost 1,700 tonnes of carbon in 2028.

    A cabinet report says it is because many buildings on the council’s estate are still burning large amounts of gas.

    Councillors have now signed off on plans to renew the authority’s gas supply contract for another four years….

    It’s expensive too:

    …This includes the council spending an extra premium of £546,000 on “green gas”, which is allegedly better for the climate than normal natural gas.

    Writing on the mayor’s blog, Labour Councillor Kye Dudd, cabinet member for climate, said the council’s direct emissions of greenhouse gases had halved over the past eight years.

    But he added that the programme to get to carbon neutral was now in the “toughest phase.”

    “We’re now into the phase of the programme that we always knew would be the toughest to deliver and have taken the steps necessary, such as the formation of Bristol City Leap, to have the tools available to meet our target of being a carbon neutral council by the end of 2025,” he said.

    Like

  46. Mark – can’t find any costing info in your Birmingham City Council link “What is the council doing about climate change”. wonder why?

    but notice it has a link to –
    “Are you struggling with the cost of living?
    You can find help with accessing grants, useful advice and money that you may be entitled to. Visit our cost of living support page”

    which has this statement – “You can download our leaflet for advice and support on the cost of living, which is available in 11 languages.”

    that’s what I call multicultural.

    Like

  47. Dougie,

    The costs will be well hidden. However, the Daily Mail has a piece accusing the Council of spending £10 million on a 2.5 mile cycle lane, which it claims is rarely used:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12491087/Furious-locals-slam-bankrupt-Birmingham-council-wasting-10million-2-5-mile-cycle-highway-wider-bus-lane-barely-used-causes-traffic-chaos.html

    Photographs taken yesterday show bumper-to-bumper cars, with the lane sitting empty and one cyclist even ignoring it to ride down the main road instead.

    Residents say the £9.85million route only brought commuter chaos in an already over-congested city and cyclists continue to ride along the pavement or road.

    Like

  48. “Green energy: Bridgend council pulls £6.5m HyBont funding”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-66854183

    A £31m green energy scheme has had millions of pounds pulled from the project by a council that says it can no longer afford it.

    HyBont aims to create green hydrogen for local authority vehicles, including bin lorries and buses.

    But Bridgend council’s cabinet said it could no longer afford to provide £6.5m towards the project….

    …on Tuesday council cabinet members decided to withdraw financial support after a report said the authority would be expected to contribute about £6.5m in the coming years.

    But with the council “having predicted a multi-million pound deficit for 2024-25 and faced with significant new budget pressures”, officials advised council leaders to pull out.

    Corporate director for communities, Janine Nightingale, told the meeting it was “difficult decision” and said the council was “hugely committed” to its own net zero strategy.

    But she said, when initially approached by Welsh government, “it was not clear at that point the substantial revenue and capital implications that would need to be invested” by the council….

    Is this an early sign of financial realities beginning to dawn on Councillors, of the winds of change blowing through this area?

    Like

  49. “Basildon waste factory is demolished after costly legal battle”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-66895848

    Contractors have started demolishing a multi-million pound waste factory that was only built 10 years ago and was the subject of a protracted legal dispute.

    The Tovi Eco Park in Basildon was supposed to process 420,000 tonnes of black bag waste from Essex households.

    However, the facility did not meet the targets set out as part of an £800m contract and the operating company lost a High Court battle.

    The dismantling project is expected to finish next year.

    Essex County Council (ECC) signed a deal with UBB Waste Limited in 2012 for the mechanical biological treatment factory in Courtauld Road.

    But the local authority claimed that from 2016, UBB was not processing the required level of waste and said the three biohalls at the park were 50% to small.

    The company, however, said the “wrong kind of waste” was being delivered and it denied any failings.

    A judge at the Construction and Technology Court in London ruled in the council’s favour and said ECC could terminate the 28-year contract….

    …Peter Schwier, Conservative cabinet member for the environment, waste reduction and recycling at ECC, said UBB agreed to pay for the dismantling works which would be completed by summer 2024.

    He declined to say what would happen to the site once it was returned to ECC, and invited people to take part in an ongoing consultation about waste treatment Essex….

    Despite winning the case this will have cost the Council an awful lot of money, but the report doesn’t bother telling us how much. Building then demolishing the facility isn’t exactly “green”, either.

    That would be this Basildon Council:

    “Basildon 2030 – Our net-zero greenhouse gas emissions target
    Basildon Council has set an ambitious target to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2030.”

    https://basildon.gov.uk/article/8580/Basildon-2030-Our-net-zero-greenhouse-gas-emissions-target

    Like

  50. “North Lanarkshire Council to close libraries, pools and sports centres”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-66954929

    North Lanarkshire Council is closing 39 swimming pools, sports centres, libraries and community facilities to plug a budget shortfall.

    It plans to close facilities including the Keir Hardy Sports Centre in Holytown and the John Smith Pool in Airdrie to save £4.7m a year.

    The Labour-run council says it needs to find £64m of savings over three years.

    No dates have been given for the closures and affected staff are likely to be offered redeployment.

    Council leader Jim Logue said making the decision was “overwhelmingly difficult”….

    That would be this North Lanarkshire Council:

    “Climate Plan ACT2030”

    https://www.northlanarkshire.gov.uk/your-council/council-strategies-and-plans/council-strategies/climate-plan-act2030

    In 2019, we declared a Climate Emergency and set a target of net-zero for North Lanarkshire by 2030. Tackling and preventing further climate change is important to us all.

    I wonder what this glossy brochure and plan cost to produce, and how much the plan will cost to implement? They don’t say, of course. The only reference in the document to budgets is to carbon budgets.

    Like

  51. “BBC’s Shared Data Unit reveals Somerset Council financial deficits”

    https://www.somersetcountygazette.co.uk/news/23738319.bbcs-shared-data-unit-reveals-somerset-council-financial-deficits/

    OVER £50m of cuts and savings have been identified across the three councils which cover Somerset, as they battle to cover a combined deficit expected to be almost £80m.

    However, Somerset Council will still have to make further cuts to avoid a budget black hole….

    …Somerset Council, which replaced Somerset County Council and its four district councils earlier this year, is the largest of the county’s three councils and runs a net revenue budget of 493.4m — larger than those of North Somerset Council and B&NES put together.

    It is facing a deficit of £45.5m, but has already planned £40.8m of cuts and savings, the BBC investigation revealed.

    Ms Leyshon said: “The cost of providing care for adults and children most in need of support has been rising steadily for over a decade, together with the numbers of people needing care. Central government has no plan for how care can be paid for, especially in areas with a growing older population.

    “After a more than a decade of austerity, inflation is running much higher than any council’s ability to raise income, eating into the ability to fund services. Interest rate rises also affect councils, as well as households with mortgages and those paying rent.”

    The council’s executive is due to meet on 6 September where Ms Leyshon will deliver an update on budget outturns and reserves inherited from the previous councils. Somerset Council will work on setting its budget though the autumn.

    Ms Leyshon said: “No one should underestimate how challenging this year’s budget is, and how challenging next year’s budget will be….”.

    That would be this Somerset Council:

    “Work on Somerset’s first net-zero school begins”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-66946933

    Work on a carbon net-zero primary school has started with a timber framing ceremony.

    Orchard Grove Primary School, Somerset’s first ever carbon net-zero school, is expected to be ready for staff and students from September 2024.

    The school in Taunton will offer places to 420 pupils from reception to year six, as well as 52 nursery places.

    The design allows for an extension to accommodate a further 210 children if these are needed in the future.

    Funded by Somerset Council as part of their School Growth Programme, the £12.3m build will incorporate solar panel technology, air source heat pumps and electric vehicle charging points in line with the council’s commitment to decarbonisation.

    Councillor Tessa Munt, executive lead member for children, families and education at Somerset Council, said: “These are exciting first steps for our new school build. We are creating a modern learning environment for Orchard Grove Primary’s future pupils, where they will be supported to thrive and achieve.”…

    …”There will be more like this to come as the council delivers against its Climate Emergency Strategy and meanwhile, we continue to decarbonise as many of our existing buildings as possible.”

    Orchard Grove children are currently attending Isambard Kingdom Brunel School in Wellington and will move to the new site with their teachers when it is ready next year.

    The BBC article doesn’t say what will happen to the old school, and how that fits in with “carbon” reduction plans. Funnily enough, it also makes no reference to Somerset Council’s financial difficulties and £40M+ planned cuts. If this one net zero project didn’t proceed, then more than a quarter of those cuts would be unnecessary.

    Like

  52. “South Gloucestershire Council garden waste fees set to double”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-67003569

    Garden waste fees are set to double and free parking could end across South Gloucestershire as the council faces a huge funding shortfall.

    Cabinet members will meet to approve next year’s budget on Thursday and face “incredibly difficult decisions”.

    The proposed increase in the garden waste charge from £30 to £60 would boost the council’s finances by £1.3m a year.

    South Gloucestershire Council needs to plug a £7.7m budget gap in 2024.

    The garden waste service cost £36 when it was first introduced in 2014 and currently costs £30 per household.

    A spokesperson for South Gloucestershire Council said: “The average charge of a neighbouring eight local authorities around South Gloucestershire is £55.25 per year.

    “Costs of delivering this service and disposing of garden waste have increased…meaning we have no choice to put them up.”

    Free car parking at council owned sites would also end under the plans with the cost set to raise £1.5m to £2m a year.

    The council blamed factors outside of their control including inflation, fewer homes being built meaning not as many council tax payers and delays to the Government’s Levelling Up Bill….

    They blamed lots of factors, but no mention of this (goodness knows what it all costs):

    “Climate and nature emergency in South Gloucestershire”

    https://beta.southglos.gov.uk/climate-emergency-in-south-gloucestershire/

    Like

  53. “Medway: Christmas lights cancelled by council”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-67057003

    A council has cancelled all its Christmas lights for 2023 due to a “challenging financial situation”.

    Medway Council in Kent said it made the “sad and difficult decision” after identifying a potential overspend of £17m for this financial year….

    That would be this Medway Council:

    “Climate Change Action Plan
    In 2019 Medway Council declared a climate emergency, to respond to one of the most important challenges of our time.”

    https://www.medway.gov.uk/climatechangeplan

    Like

  54. “Mid and East Antrim council to sell offices amid £7m shortfall”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-67136627

    Mid and East Antrim Borough Council plans to sell some of its offices amid efforts to address a £7.2m funding shortfall.

    Smiley Buildings in Larne will be put on the market with staff and services relocated, BBC News NI understands.

    The council’s budget problems emerged last month following an external analysis of its finances.

    Its interim chief executive said the pressures are “significant and growing”.

    Valerie Watts told councillors on Monday that spending controls and a “budget-tracking dashboard” have been set up.

    She said charts have also been established to look at staffing levels across the council, including permanent, agency and casual roles….

    That would be this Mid and East Antrim Council:

    https://www.midandeastantrim.gov.uk/council/policies-and-documents/climate-change-sustainability/climate-sustainability-environment-reporting/climate-and-sustainability-action-plan-2023-2027

    I wonder how much that cost to put together and how much it is costing to implement?

    Like

  55. A year ago, this was reported:

    “Bury Council announce budget deficit amid cost increases”

    https://www.burytimes.co.uk/news/23043724.bury-council-announce-budget-deficit-amid-cost-increases/

    The council could be forced to make millions of pounds of budget cuts amid “unprecedented” economic uncertainty.

    Local authority chiefs have reported a potential budget deficit of £29m for the 2023/2024 year with inflation and cost of living increases mainly to blame.

    Previous estimates for the council’s Medium Term Financial Strategy had predicted a £14m gap, but factors including the war in Ukraine and supply chain disruptions have prompted a “refresh” of the budget, more than doubling that initial forecast….

    …“The latest budget forecasts are that we will need to make cuts of £29m in 2023/24.

    “This has rapidly increased from £14m due to the unprecedented uncertainty with the economy.

    “Like everyone else we’re being hit by volatile energy prices and the cost-of-living crisis.”…

    ..This could mean a reduction of public services run by the council.

    The largest saving target is in children’s services with £4.9m earmarked for reviews of high-cost social care placements and the provision of more specialist housing and foster carers in the borough to save costs….

    Compare and contrast:

    “Bury Council electric vehicles delivered to cut CO2 emissions”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-67284098

    A council has taken delivery of 10 electric vehicles as part of its commitment to becoming carbon neutral.

    The vehicles will replace old diesel vans at Bury Council with a further five electric vehicles to be delivered by the end of 2023.

    It forms part of the council’s £8.5m vehicle replacement programme and will be used by several departments….

    Like

  56. “Parishes urged to apply for climate change grants”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1d2lgjz718o

    Parishes in north Devon, with fewer than 1,000 residents, have been urged to apply for climate change project grants.

    The scheme was set up by North Devon District Council in 2020.

    Councillors have agreed to re-introduce the scheme for 2024/2025 making use of the £40,000 that was left over from the scheme.

    When it ran £60,000 was set aside for a three-year period but only a third of that has been allocated as not enough applications were received.

    Only six parishes out of 37 eligible have received money from the scheme so far, the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said.

    Projects have to be sustainable and look to improve the environment or tackle climate change, which could include “wilding” open spaces and renewable energy projects.

    The two funding deadlines are 31 August 2024 and 31 January 2025.

    That would be this Devon Council:

    “Devon council warns of inevitable cuts without Westminster help”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-63474511

    A council leader has warned of inevitable cuts to services, unless the government provides more support.

    Conservative leader, John Hart, said the financial situation of Devon County Council had “never been so bleak”.

    He said Devon’s core funding from the government had reduced by 72% in real terms in the 11 years up to 2021/2022.

    The government said this year it had made an additional £3.7bn available to councils in England, including an extra £40.9m for Devon County Council….

    …Mr Hart said the council had already introduced cost-saving measures that included a freeze on staff recruitment in non front-line areas, delayed planned investment in IT and infrastructure projects and a reduction in its heating and lighting bills.

    He added: “We will do everything in our power to continue to do this and find new ways to do things better and more sustainably.

    “But, quite obviously, a bankrupt council can do none of these things and we have no choice now but to make savings that will inevitably hurt some people.”…

    A good start might be to reallocate “climate change” funding that they haven’t even managed to spend because nobody wants it!

    Like

  57. Mark, according to docs put online by North Devon Council £20k of the £23k paid as Climate & Environment Grants (AKA Climate Emergency Grants) to parish councils since 2020 went to only one parish – indeed to only one building. A £10k CEG bought solar panels for a village hall. Alas, it turned out that the hall’s heating system couldn’t work with solar, so a second £10k CEG was awarded to buy a new heating system for the hall. Oops!

    Smaller grants went to two other parishes for planting flowers and trees. It looks like another three parishes either withdrew their applications or were refused.

    (The now occasionally solar-heated village hall in AngstyAnstey, South Morton, is about four miles from a German-owned subsidywind farm called Batsworthy Cross. Shouldn’t that be Crossworthy Bats? Or perhaps even Rotierende Fledermauskiller?)

    Liked by 1 person

  58. What a waste of time and money:

    “Working from home produces 13% of York Council’s CO2 emissions – report”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-67491763

    More than 13% of a council’s CO2 emissions come from staff working from home, a survey has found.

    A report by City of York Council said an estimated 723 tonnes of carbon dioxide was produced in 2022-23.

    It was caused by home workers using office equipment, lighting and heating during the day, the report said.

    Working from home produced far more emissions than staff commuting and business travel put together, the findings revealed.

    However, it was not as much as the greenhouse gas emissions from heating council buildings at 2,607 tonnes, or from its fleet of vehicles which produced 1,669 tonnes.

    According to the Local Democracy Reporting Service, councillor Kate Ravilious told a meeting that the homeworking CO2 figure “was a surprisingly large chunk” and asked what more the council could do.

    In response, Shaun Gibbons, head of carbon reduction at the council, said the NHS produced a report during the Covid pandemic “which compared people working from an office with working from home and which direction would be best to reduce emissions”.

    “The answer wasn’t simple,” he said.

    “It’s very dependent on the time of the year, how far people generally travel to their workplace, the availability of public transport to get to their workplace.

    “The inclusion of staff commuting and home working has shown areas where improvements can be made and we’re in the process of updating our council travel plan with suggestions of reducing emissions associated with staff travel and homeworking.”

    The report also shows comparable emissions have reduced by almost 10% between 2021-22 and 2022-23, as the council aims to be net-zero city by 2030.

    Meanwhile:

    “York council cutbacks are ‘just the beginning of some hard years in the future’”

    https://yorkmix.com/york-council-cutbacks-are-just-the-beginning-of-some-hard-years-in-the-future/

    A senior City of York Council officer has warned that significant cuts to services are “just the beginning of some hard years in the future.”

    York’s new Labour administration, which was elected into power in May 2023, has the challenge of saving £40m over the next four years to narrow its cumulative budget gap.

    Senior council officers didn’t mince their words when telling executive members what this meant when they met on Thursday.

    Chief finance officer Debbie Mitchell said: “Over the next four years the council will really see some of the most significant financial challenges we’ve ever experienced and I can’t overstate the seriousness of the situation and the scale of the challenge ahead….”

    …But Ms Mitchell said: “We won’t save £40m without some cuts in service.”

    Chief operating officer Ian Floyd said: “This is serious.

    “This is probably the biggest financial challenge the council will have faced.”

    He added: “When you look at savings and what you might be able to do, there’s often a lot of nice words about efficiencies, transformation and we’ll do things differently.

    “You can’t take £40m out through nice words, you only take it out through some hard cuts.”

    Mr Floyd said: “This is really just the beginning of some hard years in the future.”…

    I wonder how much that pointless carbon emissions report cost? However deep the cuts elsewhere, there’s always money for carbon reports, even though York Council could cut its emissions to zero, and it would make no measurable difference to anything. I would suggest they spend their time )and money) instead on making life better, rather than worse, for the residents of York.

    Like

  59. “Woking Borough Council gives away free EV charging in IT error”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-67499892

    A council in £2.6bn of debt is giving away up to £148,000 a year of free electric vehicle charging due to an IT error, it has been revealed.

    Antiquated IT systems meant Woking Borough Council has been unable to charge motorists at Red Car Park in Victoria Square.

    The cost is about the same as is needed to save a community bus service struggling with funding cuts.

    Councillor Leslie Rice said: “It does not reflect well on council officers.”

    In June, the Surrey local authority imposed emergency spending restrictions on itself due to its debt.

    All spending for non-essential services were halted after the Section 114 notice was issued….

    Like

  60. “Edinburgh city council to spend £56m on low emission vehicles”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-67519245

    Edinburgh city council will spend £56m replacing hundreds of its vehicles to meet new environmental rules.

    The local authority’s fleet of bin lorries, road sweepers and civic cars will need to comply with the city’s new Low Emission Zone (LEZ).

    More than 280 vehicles will be replaced by June 2024 in order to avoid fines.

    The council said vehicles that cannot be directly replaced, such as HGVs, will have their engines swapped for LEZ-compliant versions.

    It hopes more than a quarter of its fleet would be “electrified” after the switch…

    …The council said it hoped to raise around £2m from the disposal of existing vehicles and £3.2m from cash reserves, but around £51m would need to be borrowed to fund the overhaul.

    In total, about 1,000 vehicles are due to be replaced to meet future net zero targets…

    That would be this Edinburgh City Council:

    “‘Tears shed’ as Edinburgh council cuts health and social care by £33m
    Warnings have been issued that the cuts will ‘certainly lead to more lives lost’.”

    https://news.stv.tv/east-central/tears-shed-as-edinburgh-council-cuts-health-and-social-care-by-33m

    Cuts totalling £33m have been made to Edinburgh’s health and social care budget amid a crisis in funding and staffing essential services for the city’s most vulnerable residents.

    Tears were shed during a meeting where measures to help balance the books were passed, as attendees were warned they would “certainly lead to more lives lost”.

    However council and health chiefs stressed the proposals – which included axing an employability scheme for people with severe mental health issues – were the “least worst” options available in the face of a £47m financial black hole….

    Liked by 1 person

  61. Nottingham City Council featured prominently in my piece above, due to this:

    Nottingham City Council cuts after energy firm loses millions

    A council which is making £12.5m in cuts poured millions of pounds into a loss-making energy firm, a report has found.

    Nottingham City Council set up the not-for-profit Robin Hood Energy in 2015 to try to provide cheaper energy.

    But by March 2019, the company had lost £34.4m despite large loans from the authority, external auditors Grant Thornton said.

    The leader of the council admitted there were failings in its governance.

    It comes as the council faces the impact of the coronavirus crisis, with 150 job cuts and the closure of a day centre for people with disabilities proposed last month in a bid to save £12.5m.

    Today we learn this:

    “Updates as Nottingham City Council announces ‘bankruptcy'”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-england-nottinghamshire-67374024

    I suppose the only surprise is that it took so long.

    Like

  62. Typical BBC. The headline in the Science & Environment” section of its website has a clickbait headline that categorically says “‘Solar canopy’ to cut energy bills”, but click on the link and headline morphs into the rather different:

    “Cornwall Council leaders hope solar canopy will cut energy bills”

    “Hope” isn’t the same as “will”.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cornwall-67664736

    A “solar canopy” is to be installed over a car park at Cornwall Council’s headquarters in Truro.

    It’s hoped the 543 solar panels above the visitors’ car park at New County Hall will eventually supply a third of the building’s energy needs.

    Work is due to start in January aimed at significantly reducing running costs and the council’s carbon footprint.

    A quarter of the building’s power already comes from solar panels on the roof….

    “Hoped”, “eventually” “a third of a building’s needs”.

    …The work has been funded through the council’s £20m Renewable Energy and Low Carbon Technology Fund.

    That would be this Cornwall Council, as reported on by the BBC just last month:

    “‘Stringent measures’ threat amid council budget woes”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crgpw5kqv0wo

    Senior officers at Cornwall Council have been told “stringent measures” will have to be taken if an overspend of £14.9m is not brought under control.

    The move could mean the council will not take on any new commitments or services if savings are not made by the end of this month.

    The message was delivered by the council’s deputy leader councillor David Harris at a meeting of the Conservative cabinet.

    A council performance report for the second quarter of the 2023/24 financial year shows an overspend of £14.9m….

    …He said a budget and savings review group had been set up to identify areas where the overspend could be reduced.

    “All senior officers have been made aware that if overspends cannot be brought under control by the end of this month some fairly stringent measures will be introduced to reduce spending, including no new commitments being taken on without being approved by the review group,” he said.

    The council announced in September it would need to cut some services as it faced “difficult decisions” to achieve nearly £75m in savings by 2028.

    Like

  63. “Bath and North East Somerset: Views sought on ‘difficult’ budget plans”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-67737371

    A consultation has opened on budget plans for a council that needs to find £10.3m of savings.

    Bath and North East Somerset Council (BANES) says it faces “very difficult choices.” for the final budget for 2024-25.

    As well as increasing council tax, the authority is reviewing money going to community support contracts, including prevention services….

    …Mr Elliott said the council was “very concerned about the potential impacts of these reductions in our community support contracts, particularly on preventative services”.

    “We are now in a position where we have to consider savings in these areas due to the effect of over a decade of government funding cuts to councils and a completely inadequate government response to the huge pressures in social care” he said….

    That would be this Bath and North East Somerset Council:

    “What we’re doing to address the Climate Emergency
    Responding to the Climate Emergency is one of our two core policies, alongside giving people a bigger say. It is integral in all that we do. Use this page to learn more about the actions we’re taking, the progress we’ve made and the policy and strategy behind it.”

    https://beta.bathnes.gov.uk/what-were-doing-address-climate-emergency

    Like

  64. “Sheffield City Council emissions only cut by 3% since 2019”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-67785358

    A council has only reduced emissions by 3% since declaring a “climate emergency” over four years ago, a report has revealed.

    Sheffield City Council agreed in 2019 to set a target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2030 for both the council and the city.

    The authority’s first annual climate action report found emissions had fallen 3% since then.

    Councillors were told more work was needed to achieve their target by 2030….

    A three per cent cut in 4 years, with a target date for net zero 7 years from now. At that rate (and disregarding the fact that they probably achieved their cheapest and easiest “wins” first) it’ll be close to 2150 before they get there. I wonder what it has cost to achieve so little? Naturally, the article doesn’t talk about the costs so we don’t know.

    Like

  65. “Bournemouth council-run plant nursery shuts amid cost-cutting”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-67934253

    A council-run plant nursery has permanently closed as the authority seeks to plug a £50m funding gap.

    Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council said Kings Park Plant Nursery in Bournemouth would not be reopening as usual in the spring.

    It said the move would save £85,000 in the 2024/25 financial year.

    Deputy council leader Millie Earl said the decision had been “a difficult one” and that staff and volunteers were being supported through the process…

    That would be this Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council:

    “Climate Action Strategy 2023 to 2028”

    Click to access BCP0466_Climate%20Action%20strategy_Draft%2020%20Feb%202023.pdf

    …A core council climate budget has been established and doubled in 2021 to provide
    the foundations to fund resources to support climate action progress…

    …In 2022 a Public Works Loan Board funding source was agreed and secured for use in delivering the infrastructure and assets required to transition BCP and the council to a climate safe operating space.

    The fund is to the value of £20M available over the next 4 years to be spend on capital projects. It can accessed through the Infrastructure Board with Cabinet/ Full Council approval of spend….

    Like

  66. “Councils in crisis: Town Hall debt levels staggering, MPs warn”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67707156

    The debt mountain at UK councils has reached staggering levels, posing a risk to local services, the Public Accounts Committee has said.

    Analysis shows UK councils owe a combined £97.8bn to lenders, equivalent to £1,100 per person, as of September.

    Committee chairwoman Meg Hillier warned of an “extreme and long-lasting effect” if more councils go bust.

    Council leaders say years of under-funding have forced them to invest in commercial ventures.

    The comments come as town hall leaders have started to reveal stark draft budgets for the coming financial year.

    Major cuts are being planned at Thurrock, Woking and Nottingham City Councils – all of which have effectively gone bust over the last two years, at least in part, due to failed commercial investments.

    Leaders at Thurrock – which reported a financial black hole of £469m in 2022 and debts reaching £1.4bn – said they would have to make successive large cuts over the next three years to break even.

    Dame Meg said there were driving factors behind councils borrowing large sums such as “squeezed spending power” and ageing populations….

    Let me say at the outset that the reasons for Councils’ financial problems are multifarious and complex. It seems clear to me, for instance, that Governments (of all political complexions) have piled ever more statutory duties on local authorities without providing the necessary commensurate funding. No doubt the ageing populations identified by Meg Hillier are making matters worse. However, there is also a lot of waste (undeniable, I should have thought, to anyone with eyes to see), and it’s worth pointing out that the £1,100 per person equivalent of debts owed by local authorities (presented factually by the BBC, but in such a way as to seem like a scarily large sum, and perhaps it is) is a drop in the ocean compared to the per capita costs of net zero (and pretty much every Council is spending huge amounts of money on net zero). In short, ditch net zero, at both local and national level, and there should be plenty of money available to solve the Councils’ financial crisis.

    Like

  67. “Five Somerset household recycling centres could close”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-somerset-67993583

    Five recycling centres in Somerset could close because of council cuts.

    Sites in Castle Cary, Cheddar, Crewkerne, Dulverton and Williton are all at risk of closure after Somerset Council declared a financial emergency.

    It would mean Somerset would be left with 11 household waste recycling sites instead of the current 16.

    Somerset Council says the potential closures would help to save almost £1m over the next two years but “no final decision had been made”.

    It is one of the proposals unveiled by Somerset Council to stop the local authority going effectively bankrupt.

    Steve Petter, who lives in Cheddar, said the news of the potential closure of his local recycling centre was “disappointing”.

    He told BBC Radio Somerset : “This is my second home!

    “I’d have to find another recycling centre which would mean I have to get in the car for 15 to 20 miles away and go to Highbridge – that would add to the pollution that we’re trying to reduce by recycling.

    “In summer, when you’re dealing with garden waste, this is the place that you take it.”..

    Irony piled on irony. That would be this Somerset Council:

    “Somerset’s Climate Emergency Strategy
    Somerset’s Climate Emergency Strategy was developed jointly by the five Somerset local authorities, sector experts and external partners”

    https://www.somerset.gov.uk/environment-and-food-safety/climate-and-ecological-emergency/somersets-climate-emergency-strategy/

    There’s an extensive page describing Council activity. And a (perhaps unsurprising) coyness about the cost of it all.

    Liked by 1 person

  68. What a surprise. I had to fill in a North Somerset form online before Christmas and it was appallingly repetitive and stupid, unlike most of gov.uk. (Different council I know but hey.) The Cheddar area, which is so beautiful, deserves better.

    Like

  69. Oh dear:

    “Torridge District Council’s carbon footprint more than doubles”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-68104178

    Torridge District Council’s carbon footprint has more than doubled in three years, research has found.

    A Climate Emergency UK assessment of actions taken by district councils to reach net zero targets placed Torridge 149th out of 164.

    Figures showed Torridge emitted 8,011 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2022/23, compared to 3,875 in 2020/21.

    Council officers blamed a lack of funding for the high score….

    And that would be this Torridge Council too:

    “Climate Change at Torridge”

    https://torridge.gov.uk/climatechange

    Torridge District Councils have declared a ‘Climate Emergency’ and are a signatory to the Devon Climate Declaration. We have committed to a target of net zero carbon emissions from our operations by 2030, and for the districts by 2050. We recognise the impacts we have on the residents, businesses and communities of Torridge through a range of functions and services that we deliver.

    The Council has developed a Carbon, Environment and Biodiversity Plan, that will see us move to a low carbon, sustainable and resilient future and support our communities in this vital journey. The second Annual Review (PDF) [2MB] of this plan was published in September 2023.

    Resolving the causes and impacts of climate change needs a joined-up approach where everyone from the government, businesses and local residents all play their part. We understand that we are in a position to promote effective partnership working in Torridge, and by publishing our plan we hope that this will support our communities on a journey to a low carbon, sustainable and resilient future.

    We are working with the Devon Climate Emergency partnership to develop a Devon Carbon Plan (link to our DCE page below), identifying the actions we need to take to achieve net zero carbon by 2050….

    It seems that virtue signalling is harder than it looks, at least if you want to achieve something too.

    Like

  70. “Council approves plans to tackle climate change”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cp3en1n81elo

    …By 2037, the authority wants to reach net zero in relation to direct emissions from council buildings, plants and vehicles, and indirect emissions associated with energy consumed by the council.

    The cost will equate to about £26m – but the council estimates it could save around £8.2m a year once the carbon reduction measures are complete.

    According to council documents seen by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, the strategy relies on the future decarbonisation of the national grid.

    Councillor Peter Thornton, cabinet member for highways and assets, said: “We can deliver the strategy using the savings the strategy will produce.

    “We’re in a happy situation of being able to save carbon and money at the same time.”…

    Yeah, right.

    Like

  71. Straightforward reporting from the Guardian? Not really – you have to dig quite a way down to find out what really happened:

    “Lawyers raise alarm at struggle to tackle UK local government corruption
    Exclusive: Staff and councillors at 36 local authorities accused of financial crime in past decade with dozens arrested and convicted”

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/feb/02/lawyers-raise-alarm-at-struggle-to-tackle-uk-local-government-corruption

    Lawyers have raised alarm at the lack of oversight in local government, as a Guardian analysis found almost one in 10 councils in the UK have been subject to a corruption investigation in the past decade.

    Across the UK, 36 local authorities have had councillors and staff accused of economic crimes including fraud and the misuse of public funds, with dozens arrested and convicted.

    Many other councils are being scrutinised for potential financial mismanagement leading to huge losses in councils funds. One of those is Thurrock council, found to have recklessly put hundreds of millions of pounds into commercial investments, where an accountant is being investigated by the Financial Reporting Council….

    That contains an embedded link to this:

    “Thurrock council hid losses as it gambled millions on risky investments
    Official report criticises Tory-run authority’s dysfunctional leadership and says it tried to silence critics”

    https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/jun/15/thurrock-council-hid-losses-gambled-millions-risky-investments

    Bankrupt Thurrock council recklessly gambled hundreds of millions of pounds on risky commercial investments while covering up evidence of its losses and attempting to silence critics, a devastating official review has concluded….

    And what were those “commercial” investments? Read on, and eventually you get to the nub of it:

    …The review blamed Thurrock’s leadership for failing to challenge a series of significant commercial investment decisions taken by the council’s former finance director Sean Clark. It had delegated extraordinary power to him to invest hundreds of millions of pounds without meaningful political or executive oversight.

    Clark borrowed from other local authorities to finance loans of more than £600m to companies owned by the businessman Liam Kavanagh to invest in 53 solar farms. This, alongside investments in other business, exposed the council to serious losses and forced it to write off millions on bad deals….

    Yup, it was solar farm investment that bankrupted the Council.

    Like

  72. “Council could use £15m ‘to buy back gigafactory land'”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c141198wk8go

    A council will set aside £15m of public money in case it needs to buy back land where a battery factory was due to be built, it is understood.

    Plans for the gigafactory in Cambois, near Blyth, Northumberland, fell through after the collapse of Britishvolt, which originally bought the land for £4.8m.

    Councillors in Northumberland voted to approve the money – which will be held in reserve – under a so-called “strategic acquisition fund”.

    Conservative leader Glen Sanderson did not comment on the claims, but said the council needed the funds in its “back pocket” if an opportunity arose….blockquote>

    That would be this Northumberland Council:

    “Tax rise for Northumberland residents on the cards as formal council budget published
    Northumberland residents can expect council tax rises and spending cuts in the coming year after the county council published its formal budget proposals.”

    https://www.northumberlandgazette.co.uk/news/politics/council/tax-rise-for-northumberland-residents-on-the-cards-as-formal-council-budget-published-4508673

    Documents acknowledge that the council continues to face a ‘shortfall in funding’ when compared to spending demands, meaning it must annually review ‘priorities’ to address this….

    …The proposed efficiencies for this year includes shaving £3.63m from adult social care, with the vast majority of this (£3m) coming from ‘care management savings’ by reviewing individual packages of care…

    …Concerns have also been raised by opposition councillors about the council’s ongoing use of reserves. Budget documents show the council will utilise a total of £28.96m of reserves for “non-recurrent items in 2024/25….

    Like

  73. “Glasgow Council seeks £40bn with net zero investment team”

    https://jaunbaba.com/glasgow-council-seeks-40bn-with-net-zero-investment-team/

    This private investment drive was announced against a backdrop of savage cuts. In the last decade half a billion pounds has been wiped from Glasgow City Council’s budget. In an attempt to tackle the local authority’s almost £108 million shortfall over the next three years, last week’s budget saw an increase in parking charges and cuts to education and waste services.

    Glasgow has committed to Net Zero by 2030. The paper, which is to go before the council’s Net Zero and Climate Progress Monitoring Committee next week has indicated that there is a need to accelerate the delivery of the city’s carbon reduction project – but public funding is scarce.

    Councillor Susan Aitken described the climate emergency as the “issue of our times”.

    She said: “To meet this challenge and deliver the large-scale interventions that will decarbonise our city, it has long been clear that private sector investment is required. It is not possible for the council alone to make the changes that are needed.”

    The paper proposes that £4m should be allocated for the creation of the specialist green investment team which will seek partnerships in the private sector. It will aim to attract investment to the city for climate initiatives such as local heating networks, energy efficiency in buildings, renewable energy projects, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and other schemes that can accelerate decarbonisation…

    …Glasgow declared a climate emergency in 2019 and the following year council and partners published the Glasgow Climate Plan. In 2021 it launched its £30 billion ‘Greenprint for Investment’, to highlight portfolio of transformative climate investment projects to boost its 2030 Net-Zero goal.

    Members of the Net Zero and Climate Progress Monitoring Committee will be asked to refer the paper to the City Administration Committee where approval of the £4m funding award can be given.

    Liked by 1 person

  74. Look on the bright side – “the creation of the specialist green investment team”, more “Green” jobs 🙂

    wonder how long it will take “The specialist team will include people with backgrounds in finance, sustainability, procurement and law.” to burn through £4m ?

    Like

  75. Irony:

    “Carbon emissions increase at climate capital council”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4nj24dpr70o

    “A city council which considers itself the UK’s climate capital has significantly increased its net carbon footprint, according to a report.

    The research, which was put together for Peterborough City Council, said its net emissions were 7,389 of CO2e (carbon dioxide or equivalent) in 2022-23, compared with 4,813 tonnes the previous year.

    The local authority blamed its own decision to switch from a green electricity tariff, to a standard tariff.

    The Council Carbon Footprint report, external said the local authority was still “committed” to being net-zero by 2030.

    The council has aimed to be the “UK’s environment capital” since 2008, external and also hopes the entire city will be net-zero by 2040…”

    Liked by 1 person

  76. “Pembrokeshire: Council’s 12.5% tax rate rise UK’s highest”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-68492895

    “Pembrokeshire council has increased council tax by 12.5%, believed to be the highest percentage rise in the UK.

    It comes after councillors recommended increasing council tax by 16.3%, deciding against calling for a 21% rise which would have been the highest ever percentage increase in Wales.

    People in the area say that funding is desperately needed as services are negatively impacted.

    The Welsh government said the UK government was to blame…”

    That would be this Pembrokeshire Council:

    “Decarbonisation and the Nature EmergencyA5- We will promote and support initiatives to deliver decarbonisation, manage climate adaptation and tackle the nature emergency”

    https://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/cscorporatestrategy202328/csdecarbandnature

    [The fact that those objectives are often mutually contradictory almost always passes Councillors by].

    “What we are going to do

    Deliver on our plan to be a net zero carbon organisation by 2030 – our Big Green Plan.

    • Promote the importance of environmental sustainability, winning hearts and minds so that everyone in our communities are inspired to do their bit.
    • Co-ordinate and maintain oversight of zero-carbon activities via a Sustainability Board.
    • Remove carbon from the Council’s operations be that street lighting, heating our corporate buildings or from the emissions from our vehicle fleet exhausts.
    • Invest in public transport and infrastructure to support the transition to electric/hydrogen fuelled vehicles.
    • Develop a network of cycle and walking routes between 10 of our towns to reduce car usage and encourage people to be more physically active….”

    My guess is that those policies have quite a price tag and have achieved very little.

    Like

  77. “Peterborough City Council’s carbon emissions rise after tariff error”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cambridgeshire-68568204

    “Peterborough City Council’s net carbon emissions rose in the last financial year by more than 2,500 tonnes.

    The rise has been blamed on a switch from green tariff to a standard tariff in June 2022 which went unnoticed until the following year.

    The authority reported net emissions of 7,389 tonnes of CO2e (carbon dioxide or equivalent), up from 4,813 tonnes in 2021/22. 

    The council’s mayor Nick Sandford said the issue was “slightly embarrassing”.

    The article doesn’t tell us whether the bill to taxpayers went up or down. But that doesn’t matter apparently – only CO2 emissions matter.

    Like

  78. “Gigafactory land will secure investment – officials”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c0v37nd2yvwo

    The story is a puff piece for the failed Britishvolt site near Blyth in Northumberland. The piece that really surprised me is that Northumberland County Council appears to have created a wholly-owned subsidiary company to try to take this further. My money is on this going nowhere and on it costing council tax payers a lot of money:

    …However, Advance Northumberland officials said they were confident the site would “secure a significant investment at some point in time”.

    Advance Northumberland is a dedicated regeneration company wholly owned by Northumberland County Council….

    Like

  79. “Green fleet transition faces financial roadblock”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cqvn8092710o

    Costs of replacing a council’s 41 diesel waste vehicles with electric or hydrogen models have proved prohibitive, councillors have heard.

    West Devon Borough Council’s annual fleet budget would buy just over half of a hydrogen waste lorry, according to figures discussed at an overview and scrutiny committee.

    Deputy chief executive Steve Mullineaux said an electric mini-road sweeper alone would consume half of the yearly budget at £250,000, compared with its diesel counterpart’s price tag of £90,000.

    A standard diesel refuse vehicle is £160,000 compared with £460,000 for an electric version, and hydrogen alternatives escalated the cost even further, councillors were told.

    The switch to electric would also require a £500,000 depot upgrade for charging facilities, with vehicles needing recharging after about 100 miles, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS), external.

    The vast majority of the fleet would have to remain diesel, but as technology progresses, prices would come down and some smaller vehicles could be swapped as they came to the end of their life, Mr Mullineaux said.

    The overview and scrutiny committee heard that using the more environmentally friendly waste lorries had not been proven to cope well with very rural areas.

    Mr Mullineaux said: “Exeter has been using electric and has been struggling.”...”

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.