The year 2021 has seen the coldest start to a year that I can remember in the north of England (my memory realistically goes back to the mid-late 1960s). That’s not to say that it has been the coldest start to the year here, since memory is a fickle thing. And of course, weather in one small part of the world does not represent weather globally, nor can a few months of weather be said to be representative of climatic trends.  

That said, is there any significant global cooling going on? I mean, I know it’s cold here – crossing the Pennines the other day, according to my car thermometer, a drop of another 2 or 3C and it could have started snowing. We still have daffodils in full bloom in the second half of May. The trees round here have only really started showing leafage in the last week or so. But that’s here. What’s going on globally?

Fortunately, there is a useful tool at hand for this purpose. The US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) devotes a section of its website to “State of the Climate” and provides a monthly global climate report (among many other things). Here is NOAA’s data for the last 12 months, directly compared to its data for the same months one year earlier. And the data tell no lies – yes it has been getting colder globally:

May 2020 -v- May 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature rose by 0.10C.

June 2020 -v- June 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.03C.

July 2020 -v- July 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.03C.

August 2020 -v- August 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature rose by 0.02C.

September 2020 -v- September 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature rose by 0.02C.

October 2020 -v- October 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.13C.

November 2020 -v- November 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature rose by 0.05C.

December 2020 -v- December 2019: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.38C.

January 2021 -v- January 2020: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.34C.

February 2021 -v- February 2020: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.52C.

March 2021 -v- March 2020: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.31C.

April 2021 -v- April 2020: global land and ocean surface temperature fell by 0.27C.

Implications?

Let’s not get excited about this. Data for a two-year period represents nothing of significance in climatic terms. Even if the numbers were significant, they could easily be attributed to La Nina or other factors that bear no relation to anthropogenic global warming. However, there has been a definite cooling trend recently, starting with a plateauing of the rising trend, followed by a decline, which became increasingly marked, and which is perhaps now slowing down.

It is difficult to attribute the cooling trend to the impact of lockdowns responding to the Covid virus, given that although humankind’s greenhouse gas emissions reduced during the pandemic, they still continued, and greenhouse gases in the atmosphere continued to increase. All things being equal, temperatures should be rising, not falling. But all things are not equal. La Nina might explain everything.

Whatever the case, the language adopted by NOAA is interesting. Even as temperatures fell year on year, no reference to this fact is made. Instead, referring to a month which was 0.34C colder than the same month a year earlier, we are regaled with comments like:

The January 2021 global land and ocean surface temperature was 0.80°C (1.44°F) above the 20th century average and ranked as the seventh warmest January in the 142-year global records.

And then, referring to a month which was 0.31C colder than the same month a year earlier, we have this:

“…the eighth highest [temperature departure] for March in the 142-year record

It isn’t a case of cooling, according to these statements. It’s more a case of less warming.

Global Land and Ocean Surface Temperature

By the way, how do you measure global land and ocean surface temperature, and then produce an average of the two?  Not surprisingly it’s complex. But is it meaningful? CarbonBrief has a fascinating section about this on its website. There are four major datasets (of which NOAA’s is one). The four datasets show warming at different rates (so there’s the first query about the accuracy of all this). The explanation for the differences is down to the way the different datasets “deal with having little or no data in remote parts of the world, measurement errors, changes in instrumentation over time and other factors that make capturing global temperature a less-than-straightforward task.” It sounds to me that there’s a lot that can go wrong there. The biggest issue (as CarbonBrief acknowledges) is lack of data in large sections of the world.  

One dataset (HADCRUT) leaves the blanks as blanks, rather than trying to fill them in. The others all use different statistical methodologies to try to fill in the blanks (but the fact remains that they’re still blanks, and however skilled the statistical methods, we can’t know that the blanks have been properly filled in).

Anyway, then they divide the globe into grid boxes (NASA uses different grid boxes to the other three). They also differ in how many land stations they have around the world, and in when their data series commenced. Then they combine the grid boxes to produce average temperatures for the northern and southern hemispheres. That’s a problem in itself, since the northern hemisphere provides more real data. And we haven’t even touched on the Urban Heat Island Effect (UHI), and adjustments made to reflect that.

All of which makes the idea of an average global temperature (on a planet where temperatures can vary on any given day between two extremes by perhaps 100C) pretty meaningless, in my view.   However, (subject to issues such as whether the UHI is being properly adjusted for in an increasingly urbanised world) I do accept that these databases can pick up trends in global temperatures. Which brings me back to the point that NOAA’s database suggests that the world has been cooling for a little while now.

Final Thoughts

Given that the Guardian and the BBC run several climate-related articles a week, it might have been nice if they’d noticed – and mentioned – that it’s been getting colder for a few months now.   But they didn’t (at least not so far as I can see) so I thought I would.

In fact, the mainstream media don’t seem to have picked up on the recent cooling at all (a 0.52C year-on-year fall between February 2020 and February 2021 is apparently not at all newsworthy). Furthermore, in the run-up to COP 26 I don’t expect them to do so. The hysteria will continue, and I will be surprised if any of the media giants will be mentioning falling global temperatures any time soon. I bet they’d have mentioned a year-on-year increase of 0.52C though.

And there’s another thought. There’s lots of talk about the problems associated with global temperatures increasing by 1C, 2C, 3C, or even more, over the course of a century. Who would have thought that temperatures would drop by more than 0.5C in a single year?

And finally: How come the eighth highest temperature departure for March in 142 years felt so ruddy cold?

38 Comments

  1. Mark you haven’t touched the half of it. The role of temperature adjustments will loom large. Highly anonymous cooling will be edited. Your memories and experiences will be adjusted to fit the consensus view. If you persist heretic, you also will be edited. Soon CRU-NOAA will control every thermometer.

    Like

  2. Other people have been doing lockdown projects. This blogger has been looking at temperature records and is reaching heretical conclusions:

    “My first aim has been to go back to basics, to examine the original temperature data, look for trends in that data, and to apply some basic error analysis to determine how significant those trends really are. Then I have sought to compare what I see in the original data with what climate scientists claim is happening. In most cases I have found that the temperature trends in the real data are significantly less than those reported by climate scientists. In other words, much of the reported temperature rises, particularly in Southern Hemisphere data, result from the data manipulations performed by the climate scientists on the data. This implies that many of the reported temperature rises are an exaggeration.”

    https://climatescienceinvestigations.blogspot.com/2020/12/45-review-of-year-2020.html

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I won’t get too excited until we have a lengthening “pause”, or perhaps “pause redux”. Even then we ought to measure trends over 30 years rather than shorter periods.

    Even then temperatures themselves are a little too abstract. I would prefer to move the battle onto the alleged consequences of global warming (e.g. declines in crop yields, climate refugees, etc, etc, which there are no signs of). I would be inclined to let alarmists trill about temperature records, and then reply: “And nothing bad happened.”

    Liked by 2 people

  4. This is where I came in, about 14 years ago I believe, when Anthony Watts was posting photos of temperature stations placed on tarmac downwind of jet planes, and over at Steve McIntyre’s ClimateAudit they were discussing the adjustments that had to be made when the water for measuring ocean temperatures was hauled aboard in leather buckets instead of oaken ones. Then around 1940 the Brits (who owned 70% of merchant shipping) for some odd reason stopped measuring ocean temperatures and it was left up to the Yanks, who measured with thermometers attached to the hull near the water intake.. Suddenly the temperature of 79% of the earth’s surface jumped by a degree or two, and all because of U-boats.

    Does anyone have a link to an article (Steve Milloy?) pointing out how NOAA recently readjusted early 20th century temperatures downwards, almost doubling 20th century warming from 0.5°C to 0.9°C at the stroke of a pen, and therefore doubling the effort we have to make to keep temperature rise to less than 1.5°C? I mean, if they can admit in 2020 that the true figure for 20th century warming was twice the estimate made twenty years previously, what’s to stop them doing the same thing in 2040? Maybe the true figure for 20th century warming was 1.8°C and we passed the level of catastrophic warming ages ago and didn’t notice?

    The temperature graph is like a piece of string fixed at both ends. Present temperature measurements are correct by definition, otherwise the science wouldn’t be settled, which it is – Q.E.D. And temperatures in the dim distant past can’t be argued with, because they were measured by scientists at a limited number of sites (Central England, Paris, Prague, and – bizarrely – County Antrim spring to mind) and the thermometers used are in museums for anyone to check. So all the adjusters can do is mess with the figures in between, playing merry hell with MBH98 and a whole lot of other settled science.

    And one final thing. About the empty spaces in between which Mark mentions. I once mentioned that Météo France was claiming that my region of France had experienced 5°C of warming in 50 years. France, like the UK, USA, New Zealand etc. possesses a large number of islands scattered over the globe, which must have an inordinate effect on average temperature measurements. If you want to know how hot it is in the middle of the Indian Ocean, it’s Kerguelen or nothing. There’s nothing there but a thermometer, and nowhere else for thousands of kilometres around. And the same goes for the Arctic, where, I read somewhere, NOAA one day chopped the number of reporting stations from hundreds to a dozen or so. My only experience of data sampling was in market research forty years ago. A survey manager who acted like the NOAA wouldn’t last long.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. “Whatever the case, the language adopted by NOAA is interesting.” True, and I think we may hear more examples of this if we ever enter a “Pause 2” type situation.

    E.g., “This year 20xx has been relatively cold, but still among the warmest X out of the last XX years.”

    Also then maybe something like: “This year 20xx has been slightly cooler due to X (La Nina/volcanic dust/strong trade winds/heat hiding in the deep oceans/whatever) but CO2 emissions are still rising and global warming has not gone away – it’s just being masked by X, for now. So when X goes away, don’t worry, climate change will return with a vengeance”.

    And then, if it gets a bit warmer again, followed by: “There never was a “pause” in global warming or climate change”, as per the Guardian in 2014:
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/planet-oz/2014/feb/12/global-warming-fake-pause-hiatus-climate-change

    Move along, nothing to see here!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Thanks for all the comments, and apologies for the delay in replying, due to being busy with other stuff.

    JIT – I’m not excited at all. As I’m at pains to point out in the piece, this is very short-lived cooling so far, and may readily be explicable by something like La Nina. I just find it disappointing that there is absolutely no balance in media coverage, and even NOAA seem to me to be more supportive of an agenda than of objective science.

    I do agree that (at least absent any long-term cooling) the best strategy is to point to the lack of real problems firmly attributable to climate change, despite the hype. But then, we do have a problem in saying that, since much of the media, especially the Guardian and the BBC in the UK, will big up every passing press release relating to climate alarmism, and will happily attribute any and every bad or problematic event to climate change.

    Like

  7. Looking for Sky News’s daily climate show I came across their Global Warming Tracker, produced by the University of Oxford’s Environmental Change Institute.
    https://news.sky.com/story/the-daily-climate-show-track-global-warming-with-our-live-counters-12262823

    This purports to show global temperature change in real time, but in fact is simply a clock recalibrated in °C reproducing a straight line temperature rise from 1880 to the present. It shows temperature rising by about 0.000000001°C per second, completely ignoring the fact that monthly average global temperatures regularly drop tens of millions of times that over a period of months or even years. What does Ofcom think about this fake news?

    Like

  8. This is a tragedy, and I feel bad even mentioning it. However, it suggests that cooling extends to China currently:

    “China ultramarathon: Severe weather kills 21 runners”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-57216601

    “Twenty-one runners have died after extreme weather struck a long-distance race in north-western China.

    High winds and freezing rain hit participants in the 100km (60-mile) ultramarathon in the Yellow River Stone Forest, a tourist site in Gansu province, on Saturday.

    The race was halted when some of the 172 runners went missing, and a rescue operation was launched.

    Many of the stranded runners reportedly suffered from hypothermia.”

    Like

  9. “Wet and cold May leads to fruit crop delay”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-57255320

    “Fruit crops such as strawberries and plums are expected to be up to three weeks late this year due to the recent cold and wet weather.

    The berry season officially started on 1 May but the chilly conditions have slowed down the growing process.

    Michael Bentley, from Castle Fruit Farm near Newent in Gloucestershire, said it was in stark contrast to last year.

    “Compared to last year they’re going to be about three weeks late. This is nature for you,” he said.”

    Nature, not climate change. And of course he’s right, but if it had been an unusually dry and hot May…?

    I see the media seems to have stopped telling us that spring is arriving earlier every year.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. A couple of years (or it could be a lifetime) ago, it was a different story, when the Guardian was reporting on the unease and existential dread lurking just beneath the surface of a warmer than usual early spring:
    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/26/i-cant-help-but-be-concerned-readers-spot-early-signs-of-spring

    Quoted are the comments of seemingly random but somehow very Guardian members of the public.

    “It’s lovely but worryingly mild”.

    “The scenes are very beautiful… but I know I’m seeing them too early: climate change terrifies me”.

    “This wild [early blossoming] plum tree grows alongside a public footpath where dog walkers, joggers, families with children and young couples are casually passing without even noticing it.” [The horror…]

    “Watching the way they [bees] are reacting to February temperatures that are really too high is fascinating. Honey bees are the ultimate evolvers, but I can’t help but be concerned!”

    However, fast forward to an unusually chilly April 2021 and it’s all strictly weather:
    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/apr/12/spring-cold-snap-hits-as-england-relaxes-covid-lockdown-restrictions

    Liked by 2 people

  11. “Experts warn hillgoers: summer slow to arrive on Scotland’s mountains”

    https://www.grough.co.uk/magazine/2021/05/27/experts-warn-hillgoers-summer-slow-to-arrive-on-scotlands-mountains

    “Mountain experts are warning those heading for the Scottish hills that summer has been slow to arrive.

    Mountaineering Scotland said a Mountain Leader posted pictures of his group on the summit of Ben Nevis last weekend in full winter conditions.

    A spokesperson for the organisation, which represents hillwalkers, climbers, mountaineers and ski-tourers north of the border, said: “While we’re on the countdown to midge season, and ticks have already been making their presence felt in the glens, cooler than average temperatures have meant many late-lying snow patches remain, some of them icy when the temperature drops.

    “Hillwalkers and climbers have been delighted to get back to Scotland’s mountains in recent weeks.

    “But Scotland’s weather hasn’t been playing ball with people’s dreams of returning to the heights.””

    Like

  12. NOAA’s report for May 2021 is now in. The global surface temperature was 0.14C lower than in May 2020. It may well be that the cooling trend of the last few months is slowing.

    At least my perception of a cool start to the year in Europe (or my bit of it), which included a cold May, has been borne out:

    “Cooler-than-average May temperatures were observed across parts of North America, the eastern Pacific Ocean, central Europe, and central Asia and India. There was a small area in eastern India that had a record-cold May temperature, encompassing only 0.1% of the world surface with a record-cold May temperature. The European temperature for May 2021 was 0.41°C (0.74°F) above average and was the coolest May since 2004. Several central European countries had their coolest May in at least 10 years. Of note, Germany had its coldest May since 2010, with a temperature that was 2.4°C (4.3°F) below the 1991–2020 period. The United Kingdom’s national temperature was 1.3°C (2.3°F) below the 1981–2010 average and was the coldest for May since 1996. North America also had a temperature departure for May that was above average; however, it was also the coolest May since 2011.”

    Like

  13. NOAA’s report forJune 2021 is now in. The global surface temperature was only 0.04C lower than in June 2020. It may well be that the cooling trend of the last few months is slowing still further.

    At least my perception of a cool start to the year in Europe (or my bit of it), which included a cold May, has been borne out:

    “Public urged to count butterflies after year of bad weather”

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57859345

    “People across the UK are being asked to take part in an annual count of butterflies amid fears they have been affected by poor weather this spring….

    ..Butterfly Conservation, the wildlife charity running the scheme, said its current records show that many species of butterflies have been affected by this year’s unseasonably cold and wet spring….”.

    Of course, they now have a new way of dealing with inconvenient weather – every type of weather (hot, cold, wet, dry) is due to climate chanage, aka CAGW aka the “climate crisis”:

    “…TV naturalist Chris Packham said participating in the Big Butterfly Count could provide key research on the impact of climate change on wildlife….

    …Conservationists warn the UK is seeing a rising number of extreme weather events, which its thought is a result of climate change, and want to learn about the effects on native butterflies so they can better understand the longer term impact on nature….

    …Dr Randle added: “We really need the public’s help to understand what is happening to our butterfly and moth populations. It’s a small but crucial thing everyone can do.

    “This information will not only help us to protect these species, but also to inform what effect the changing climate is having on our biodiversity.”…”

    Like

  14. I’m still awaiting for the numbers from NOAA for their July 2021 global report. However, the numbers are in for their report on the USA in June 2021, and given all the talk about the “heat dome”, I’m surprised by what I’ve just read:

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/202107

    “The contiguous U.S. average temperature during July was 75.5°F, 1.9°F above the 20th century average, tying with 1954 and 2003 for 13th warmest July in the 127-year record.” So joint 13th warmest July – much lower in the records than I expected, certainly than the MSM headlines had led me to expect.

    “Despite the extreme warmth across the western U.S., temperatures were below average across portions of the southern and central Plains, Midwest, Southeast and Northeast.”

    “The contiguous U.S. average maximum (daytime) temperature during July was 87.7°F, 1.1°F above the 20th century average, ranking in the warmest one-third of the record. Above-average to record-warm maximum temperatures were observed across much of the West and northern Plains. Oregon ranked warmest on record for daytime temperatures. Daytime temperatures were below average across portions of the Southwest and from the Deep South to the Great Lakes and into New England as well as across portions of the Southeast.”

    “The Alaska average July temperature was 53.7°F, 1.0°F above the long-term mean and ranked in the warmest third of the historical record for the state.
    Areas that experienced above-average precipitation across western Alaska during July also had temperatures that were below average.
    Above-average temperatures occurred across much of the eastern half of Alaska and across the Aleutians.
    The Alaskan wildfire season, to-date, is well-below average.”

    Despite all the talk of wild fires and droughts – “The July precipitation total for the contiguous U.S. was 3.36 inches, 0.58 inch above average, ranking sixth wettest in the historical period of record.”

    “Precipitation was above average across much of the Northeast, parts of the Southwest, South, Southeast, Midwest and Great Lakes. New York and Massachusetts ranked wettest on record for July.
    Following two relatively inactive monsoon seasons in the Southwest, the ridge of high pressure over the West shifted slightly to the east and the monsoon returned in mid-July bringing record rainfall and flash flooding to portions of the Southwest.
    Tucson, AZ, had its wettest July and month on record with 8.06 inches of precipitation.”

    And yet:

    “According to the August 3 U.S. Drought Monitor, approximately 46 percent of the contiguous U.S. was in drought, down from about 47 percent at the end of June. Drought intensified and/or expanded across portions of the northern Plains, northern Rockies, Northwest and from the Great Basin to the Pacific Coast. Drought also emerged across portions of Alaska and intensified across Maui in Hawaii. Drought severity lessened across the Northeast, Great Lakes and portions of the Southwest and central Rockies. Nearly 90 percent of the 11 states across the western U.S. are experiencing some level of drought.”

    A mixed bag, to say the least.

    Like

  15. Well, the results are in globally for July, and it’s official – hot, hot, hot:

    “It’s official: July was Earth’s hottest month on record”

    https://www.noaa.gov/news/its-official-july-2021-was-earths-hottest-month-on-record

    “Around the globe: the combined land and ocean-surface temperature was 1.67 degrees F (0.93 of a degree C) above the 20th-century average of 60.4 degrees F (15.8 degrees C), making it the hottest July since records began 142 years ago. It was 0.02 of a degree F (0.01 of a degree C) higher than the previous record set in July 2016, which was then tied in 2019 and 2020.”

    July is the hottest month globally every year, I believe, so we’ll wait and see what happens next month, but it looks as though the cooling trend has ended conveniently in the run-up to COP 26.

    Despite the headline, some of the details make strange reading, given the global result. For instance:

    “The record-warm July temperatures encompassed 5.06% of the world’s surface — the seventh highest July percentage for record-warm July temperatures since records began in 1951. Meanwhile, cooler-than-average conditions were present across parts of the south-central and southeastern contiguous U.S., northeastern Canada, southern Africa, northern Russia, and the southeastern Pacific Ocean.”

    “Asia’s July 2021 surface temperature was 1.61°C (2.90°F) above average — the highest July temperature departure since 1910.”

    ” Hong Kong had its fourth warmest July on record with a temperature that was 0.9°C (1.6°F) above average.”

    “Europe had its second warmest July (tied with 2010), with a temperature departure of +2.37°C (+4.27°F). This was only 0.10°C (0.18°F) shy of tying the warmest July set in 2018. Across Europe, the United Kingdom’s July 2021 temperature of 16.6°C (61.9°F) was 1.5°C (2.7°F) above average and tied as the fifth highest July temperature since national records began in 1884. According to the Copernicus Climate Change Service, Helsinki, Finland had its second warmest July on record, behind 2010. ”

    “Meanwhile, North America, South America, Africa, and Oceania had a top 10 warm July.”

    “Australia’s July 2021 mean temperature was 1.77°C (3.19°F) above average, which is the fourth warmest July in the nation’s 112-year record. Regionally, South Australia, Western Australia, and the Northern Territory had a top three warm July on record. Queensland had it seventh warmest July on record.

    New Zealand’s July 2021 temperature was 1.1°C (2.0°F) above average and tied as the sixth warmest July on record.”

    With so many places not setting new records, with temperatures maybe in the top 10 (or even the top 2) it’s difficult to see how globally the record was broken, but I suppose it must have been. Funny old business, averaging global temperatures, I guess.

    Like

  16. NOAA’s report for August 2021 is now in. They say it was the second warmest August land temperature; 6th warmest August ocean temperature; and 6th warmest combined land and sea temperature for August.

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/202108

    Interestingly, despite the hype, at 0.90C above the 20th century average, the combined land and sea temperature was 0.04C cooler than August 2020, which was 0.94C above the 20th century average. One month doesn’t create a trend, and looked at in isolation, the result is meaningless in that respect, but it’s interesting that the retreat from cooling over a 12months period, which retreat was steady for a few months, may now have stopped. Next month’s figures will no doubt reveal more.

    Like

  17. Over at NOAA, the results for September 2021 are in, and it was cooler than September 2020. As with last month, none of this is any big deal, but it rather belies the hype at the NOAA website. Combined land and sea temperature was 0.90C above the 20th century average, which means it was the same as August 2021, but 0.07C cooler than September 2020, which was 0.97C higher than the 20th century average.

    And it is reported in hyped terms at the NOAA website, which says this:

    “Only Septembers of 2015, 2016, 2019, and 2020 had a higher September temperature departure.”

    Of course, if one was so minded, one could report it this way:

    “September 2021 was cooler than four of the six Septembers immediately preceding it.”

    I wonder why they didn’t put it like that?

    Like

  18. H/T Ross Lea at Bishop Hill Unthreaded:

    “Global Temperature for September 2021 is 0.81C”

    https://clivebest.com/blog/?p=10108&mc_cid=84186e2662&mc_eid=ebc212b1a5

    “The average temperature was 0.81 C in September. This was up a little from August (0.76C). However 2021 is turning out to cooler than recent years with an average annual temperature with 3 months remaining of 0.69C. This makes it on track to be the coolest year since 2014….

    …With just 3 months to go and a continuing la Nina, it looks almost certain that 2021 will either be the coldest or the next coldest of the last 7 years.”

    Like

  19. Over at NOAA, the results for October 2021 are in, and it was cooler than September 2020. As with last month, none of this is any big deal, but it rather belies the hype at the NOAA website. Combined land and sea temperature was 0.89C above the 20th century average, which means it was 0.08C cooler than September 2020, which was 0.97C higher than the 20th century average.

    And it is reported in hyped terms at the NOAA website, which says this:

    “…the fourth highest October temperature in the 142-year record. Only Octobers of 2015, 2018, and 2019 had a warmer October..”

    Of course, if one was so minded, one could report it this way:

    “September 2021 was cooler than three of the six Septembers immediately preceding it.”

    I wonder why they didn’t put it like that?

    Like

  20. stew, two responses. First, rather than stealth edit my error, I meant to say that October 2021 was cooler than September 2021, but warmer than October 2020 – it was actually 0.04C warmer than October 2020, but 0.09C cooler than October 2019.

    Secondly, this is a report of global temperatures, not local ones, so I’m not sure you’re correct to say that globally October is usually cooler than September.

    Like

  21. Yer right, but would that need a second Dominic Cummings to make any headway?

    Like

  22. Over at NOAA, the results for November 2021 are in, and it was cooler than November 2020. None of this is any big deal, but it rather belies the hype at the NOAA website. Combined land and sea temperature was 0.91C above the 20th century average, which means it was 0.06C cooler than November 2020, which was 0.97C higher than the 20th century average.

    Globally, it was a mixed bag:

    “Compared to all months, November 2021 was the ninth highest percentage for record-high temperature for any month since 1951. Meanwhile, cooler-than-average November temperatures were present across much of Alaska and Australia and across parts of Greenland, northwestern China, and the north, eastern, and southeastern Pacific Ocean.”

    Like

  23. The NOAA results for December 2021 are in (they have been for some time, but I lost focus while looking at the 2021 year report). Combined land and sea temperature was 0.83C above the above the 20th century average, making it 0.05C warmer than December 2020, but 0.22C cooler than December 2019. It was the coolest month since May 2021, which it exceeded by 0.02C.

    Like

  24. The NOAA results for January 2022 are in. Combined land and sea temperature was 0.89C above the 20th century average, making it 0.06C warmer than December 2021 and 0.09C warmer than January 2021, but a whopping 0.25C cooler than January 2020.

    Like

  25. I like the word “whopping” but feel it should only be used for ice cream cones or how much gas we need to import !!!

    Like

  26. The NOAA results for February 2022 are in. Combined land and sea temperature was 0.81C above the 20th century average, making it 0.16C warmer than February 2021, but 0.36C cooler than February 2020.

    NOAA put a brave face on it with lots of sensational sounding, but rather underwhelming claims:

    “Globally, February 2022 was the seventh-warmest February in the 143-year NOAA record. The year-to-date (January-February) global surface temperature was the sixth highest on record. According to NCEI’s Global Annual Temperature Rankings Outlook, it is virtually certain (> 99.0%) that 2022 will rank among the 10 warmest years on record.”

    Truth is, it’s a mixed bag, and nothing to justify alarmism:

    “The December 2021-February 2022 global surface temperature was 1.51°F (0.84°C) above the 20th-century average of 53.8°F (12.1°C) and tied with 2015 as the fifth-warmest December-February period in the 143-year record.

    The December-February period is defined as the Northern Hemisphere’s meteorological winter and the Southern Hemisphere’s meteorological summer. The Northern Hemisphere winter 2022 temperature departure made it the sixth-highest winter on record. Meanwhile, the Southern Hemisphere summer temperature made it the seventh-highest summer on record.

    Regionally, South America, Europe and Asia had a seasonal temperature departure that ranked among the sixth highest on record. Even though North America and Africa had warmer-than-normal seasonal temperatures, each had their coldest December-February period since 2014 and 2015, respectively.

    During December-February, temperatures were much above average across Central and South America, Europe, the Atlantic, Indian, northern and western Pacific oceans, as well as parts of western and southern Africa and western Asia. In contrast, Canada, the northern Atlantic Ocean and central/eastern tropical and southeastern Pacific Ocean had cooler-than-average December-February temperatures.”

    Like

  27. March numbers are in, and NOAA is doing it’s best to put a global warming spin on it, but it doesn’t look dramatic or crisis-ridden to me:

    https://www.noaa.gov/news/march-2022-year-to-date-rank-as-earths-5th-warmest

    “March 2022, year to date rank as Earth’s 5th warmest
    Antarctic sea ice coverage shrank to near-record low”

    Ooh! And?

    “Looking regionally, Oceania had its fourth-warmest March on record while Asia had its ninth-warmest. North America, South America, Europe and Africa all had above-average March temperatures, but none of the continents saw a top-15 warm March.”

    Anything else?

    “Asia also had its fifth warmest year-to-date temperature on record, while South America, Europe, the Caribbean region and Oceania each saw a January-through-March temperature ranked among the nine warmest on record. Africa and North America also were warmer than average, but saw their coolest year to date since 2012 and 2014, respectively.”

    Like

  28. April’s numbers are in, complete with “An undated photo showing an Augrabies Falls viewing platform destroyed by flooding on South Africa’s Orange River.”

    https://www.noaa.gov/news/april-2022-tied-as-earths-fifth-warmest

    The breathless, sensationalist nature of the reporting is more and more tabloidesque and less and less scientific in its language.

    Headline statement:

    “April was very warm throughout the globe, with the month tying 2010 as the fifth-warmest April in 143-year climate record, according to scientists from NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information.”

    Hides some less than dramatic detail:

    “The average global temperature in April was 1.53 degrees F (0.85 of a degree C) above the 20th-century average of 56.7 degrees F (13.7 degrees C), tying with April 2010 as the fifth-warmest April on record.

    Asia had its warmest April on record — dating back to 1910 — with the month running 4.72 degrees F (2.62 degrees C) above average. This surpassed the now second-warmest April in 2016 by 0.09 of a degree F (0.05 of a degree C). Unusually high temperatures across India and Pakistan contributed to the record heat in Asia, with several locations setting new April temperature records.

    Oceania had its fifth-warmest April on record, while Africa and South America saw their ninth and 12th-warmest April on record, respectively. North America was the only continent with a cooler-than-average April, seeing its coolest April since 2018.

    The world’s 10 warmest Aprils have all occurred since 2010, with 2014-2022 all ranking among the 10 warmest Aprils on record.”

    Obviously it has stopped getting warmer, so that fact has to be hidden by sentences like that above. It’s a similar story on the year to date:

    “The global temperature for the year to date (YTD, January through April 2022) was 1.57 degrees F (0.87 of a degree C) above average, making it the fifth-warmest such YTD on record.

    Asia had its fourth-warmest YTD on record, Oceania had its seventh warmest and Europe saw its 11th warmest. South America had its ninth-warmest January-through-April YTD on record, while North America saw its coolest such YTD since 2014. ”

    We are told that “Polar sea ice coverage was low”, but the detail behind that claim is less dramatic:

    “Arctic sea ice extent (coverage) averaged 5.43 million square miles in April, 243,000 square miles below the 1981-2010 average and the 11th smallest for April since records began in 1979. Despite being below average, it was the largest April sea ice extent since 2014. Antarctic sea ice extent for April 2022 was 2.25 million square miles — 390,000 square miles below average — tying with 1981 as the fourth-smallest April sea ice extent on record. Only the Aprils of 1980, 2017 and 2019 had smaller sea ice extents.”

    The Antarctic sea ice extent sounds small, until one reflects that ice levels were at these levels (or below) in 1980 and 1981. Arctic sea ice levels have been kept since 1979 only. We are not told how long Antarctic sea ice levels have been kept, but if that date is 1979 also, then these numbers don’t tell us much.

    Like

  29. “New Evidence Shows Global Warming has Slowed Dramatically Over Last 20 Years”

    https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/19/new-evidence-from-weather-balloons-shows-global-warming-has-slowed-dramatically-over-last-20-years/

    “Further scientific evidence that global warming starting to run out of steam over two decades ago has been presented by an international group of leading scientists. In a major re-evaluation of data from meteorology balloons rising through the troposphere, the scientists confirmed that temperatures have mostly paused since around 1998. The discovery can only add to pressure to re-open the so-called ‘settled science’ debate around global warming and the central part it plays in the 30-year rush towards Net Zero.

    Readings throughout the troposphere, Earth’s lower atmosphere that extends in parts up to 15 km altitude, have been available for many years. The researchers were able to use measuring metadata to improve the consistency of records obtained from almost 700 global locations, recording twice a day since 1978, at 16 pressure levels. The slowdown since 1998 observed in the balloon data is confirmed by accurate satellite data, which also shows a current pause of about 91 months. An earlier pause from 1998 to 2012 has been largely wiped from all the major surface temperature datasets.”

    Worth a read. I am in no position to comment on the science, though I thought this was interesting:

    “…So why is there so little current warming being recorded by satellites and meteorological balloons in the troposphere, yet for the major surface datasets it is onwards and upwards, business as usual? None more so than at the U.K. Met Office, where the inconvenient 1998-2012 pause was finally removed in 2020 by a 14% temperature uplift. Here is the change from HadCRUT4 to HadCRUT5….”

    “…In 2013, the move from HadCRUT3 to HadCRUT4 introduced the first temperature boost. Along with the 2020 uplift, the extra heating is thought to amount to as much as 30%. In addition, some earlier records were moved downwards, and this had the effect of accentuating the recent rise. Similar adjustments have been made to other major datasets, including those run by NASA and the U.S. weather service, NOAA. Professor Humlum looked at the adjustments to the NASA GISS dataset and found that “half of the apparent global temperature increase from January 1910 to January 2000 is due to administrative adjustments to the original data since May 2008”.

    The adjustments matter, of course, because they provide covering fire for every journalist, activist and politician looking to promote global warming, without necessarily having full mastery of the scientific brief. Using the figures from its twice-adjusted HadCRUT database, the Met Office felt able recently to make an absurd 50-50 prediction that temperatures would leap by almost half a degree centigrade to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels in one year before 2025. As expected, the message was faithfully reported by journalists across mainstream media, seemingly keen to support the political agenda behind Net Zero….”.

    Like

  30. Mark, I have argued before that it doesn’t benefit the alarmist case if by various shenanigans – searching for reasons to adjust the data in the “wrong” woods – they achieve +1.5 C. Because if we cross that threshold and apocalypse does not ensue, what then for their case that this benchmark was key?

    The key benchmarks of climate disaster or whatever we are supposed to call it are or should be its physical effects on people – the victims of extreme weather, the climate refugees, etc – all with the necessary perspective showing what has happened in such places in historical times.

    Top is the body count, which is going the “wrong” way as far as the alarmist case is concerned.

    Liked by 1 person

  31. Jit: I’ve been wondering, like the Guardian, about a radical change of terminology on our side. Let me try with ‘global heating’.

    The amazing news, you see, is that global heating has come down 99% since 1920.

    That’s using the only metric that matters.

    Corollary: whatever we’ve been doing right since 1920 we must continue to do.

    (Improving the wellbeing of ordinary human beings, through technology, medical and otherwise, seems to be the main thing. There’s legitimate debate to be had there. But seen this way we’ve already cracked the global heating problem.)

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.