Ton

Australia goes to a Referendum on Saturday on whether to add an advisory committee or council of Aborigines to the two-chamber Upper and Lower Houses. This council, called “The Voice” would “make representations” on matters relating to Aborigines (i.e. from nuclear submarines to parking fines). All details of The Voice’s composition, scope, purpose etc would thereafter be legislated but currently are unknown. In particular, who might validly claim to be Aboriginal (e.g. 1/16th) is undefined. On polling results, Labor’s plan is heading for a crushing defeat.
I have written the piece below as an antidote to the prevailing pollyanna version of Aboriginal culture hawked by Yes proponents and more or less obligatory in education here from kindergarten to university.
Nationals Senator and “No” advocate Jacinta Nampijinpa Price created an inflexion point in the Voice debate when she said that Aborigines have benefited from colonial settlement. She was answering the Guardian’s Paul Sakkal during her address to the National Press Club in Canberra last month. She cited plentiful food and tap water, but could equally have cited ending of inter-tribal massacres and infanticide.[1]
The press gallery pack had a meltdown — as if she’d claimed the sun orbits the earth. Aboriginal big-wigs and wise academics lined up to blame any outback dysfunction and violence on inter-generational trauma. Jacinta speaks from family experience. Her mother Bess Nungarrayi Price has written,
My own body is scarred by domestic violence…We Aboriginal people have to acknowledge the truth. We can’t blame all of our problems on the white man… The Racial Discrimination Act was there to protect us from white racism and we needed that protection. But it has not protected our people from ourselves…the problem now is blackfellas killing blackfellas and killing themselves.[2]
The Guardian, along with Russell Skelton’s troubled ABC-RMIT unit, rushed out their “Fact Check” misinformation to nail Jacinta’s heresy.[3] Why such uproar? It’s because the Aboriginal Industry requires that remote Aborigines be victims of white oppression. Otherwise, all Aborigine-identifiers would become colour-blind Aussies enjoying normal needs-based welfare and services. Goodbye to peak, staffed-up Aboriginal bureaucracies thriving on the taxpayer dime. Goodbye to bespoke opera tickets discounted to $25, even for Aboriginal-identifying professors on $200,000.
Alleged Aboriginal trauma, we are told, explains outback health gaps, truancy, crime and extreme domestic violence. The traumatised are said to lack agency and accountability. They must be given special care, in perpetuity, by agencies led by the Voice. In a nutshell that’s the argument for voting YES.
Northern Territory police stats throw light on the current dysfunction. Try Tennant Creek, where half the population of 3000 is Aboriginal. In the year to July, property-damage cases are up 69 per cent, housebreaking up 62 per cent and commercial break-ins up 21per cent. Common assaults and domestic assaults are each up by 31 per cent, and grog-fuelled assaults are up 41 per cent. Things are not just bad, they’re getting badder.
Where the stats get near-unbelievable is the offence totals per 100 population there, to create an offence rate. We get crimes against the person, 12.4 relative to 100 population, and crimes against property, 37. Keep in mind that one offender might generate ten or 20 break-ins or grog rampages. Other appalling figures: Assaults, 11.5; Domestic Violence 8.7; House Break-Ins, 7; and Property Damage, 16.6.
The figures are understated. They ignore women victims’ under-reporting to police, whether from shame, loyalty or fear of retribution.[4] The global Equality Institute estimates that more than 90 per cent, of domestic assaults go unreported. Likewise, the Robertson report in 1999 estimated nearly 90 per cent, of rapes in the Indigenous communities went unreported.[5]
Only half the Tennant Creek population is Aboriginal. And from NT prison and juvenile justice data, we know that locked-up offenders are overwhelmingly Aboriginal. If the police stats for Tennant Creek were divided into Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal offenders, would the Aboriginal offence rates be illuminating?
The Equality Institute’s study this year on NT domestic violence said it was among the worst in the world. In Central Australia, NPY Women’s Council has estimated that Aboriginal women are around 60 times more likely to be victims of domestic homicide than non-Aboriginal women. Domestic violence is said to cost the NT budget $600 million a year. It’s not surprising the territory has a Minister for Domestic Family and Sexual Violence, currently Kate Worden, who describes the violence as “horrific”.
Why has the plethora of well-funded Aboriginal councils not tackled the violence issue? They can’t solve the problem, they are the problem. Here’s two case studies:
The Voice’s predecessor, the Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) was created by Bob Hawke in 1990 with bipartisan political support. It was supposed to be “a radical shift towards self-determination”, to fund housing, infrastructure, jobs and legal aid, along with grants and loans to a myriad claimants. At its peak ATSIC was disbursing $1.1b a year. The bosses focused on land rights, treaties, self-determination and constitutional “reform”, as though Aboriginal women’s sufferings were irrelevant.
Indigenous legal expert Hannah McGlade took a job with ATSIC in 2001 on treaty work. She found the gamut of women’s affairs was handled by one junior staffer, part-time. A Women’s Office was first to be axed when Prime Minister Howard reduced funding. Domestic violence, child abuse and women’s rights were off-limits.[6]
In mid-2001 The Age ran an expose by Andrew Rule about the ATSIC chairman, headed “Geoff Clark: power and rape”, alleging him to be a serial perpetrator of sexual violence. Four women provided sworn allegations of assaults by Clark in the 1970s and 1980s. One woman was his child cousin at the time. Police said the evidence was not enough to secure conviction. Clark strongly denied the allegations, saying, ‘My only crime is that I am an Aboriginal and I have had the audacity to question the legitimacy of this country, to question the treatment of Aboriginal people … and I have called for a treaty.’ In 2007 he was found in a civil court proceeding to have raped one woman.
McGlade was outraged that, when the allegations arose, ATSIC women, “rights” supporters, Aboriginal big-shots and the Green Left Weekly closed ranks to denigrate the complaints as “bullshit” from the “capitalist media”. Other women stayed silent for fear of retribution. The ATSIC board, backing Clark, did not even require him to step down pending criminal investigation.
Journalist Margo Kingston, to her credit, ran a series on ATSIC failures and alleged other ATSIC leaders were suspect for sexual misconduct (Hannah McGlade agreed). The Howard government abolished ATSIC with Labor support in 2005.
A second example of black-on-black oppression involved the Swan Valley Nyungah Community (SVNC) in outer-east Perth.[7] The community was led for 40 years by an elder, Robert Bropho. A charismatic power broker, he led Aboriginal rights campaigns and became the 1990 NAIDOC “Person of the Year”.
Welfare authorities skirted around the enclave and police dumped wayward youths there. Glue-sniffing was rife among children who were sexually abused both by men and teens.[8]
In 1999 Bropho’s 15-year-old grandniece, after years of addiction and degradation, hanged herself in a derelict toilet block, the third SVNC suicide in five years. A year later a man in his 20s called Timothy Lenin Bropho (what a middle name!) and his 15-year-old cousin violently raped and injured their two-year-old niece. A child who witnessed the rape told police in 2001 that he and ten other children were also being abused. The welfare authorities gave the complaint irresolute treatment for two years. “At this particular point in Noongar history, the prosecution of Noongar male perpetrators of sexual assault was virtually unknown,” McGlade wrote. Timothy Bropho in 2002 got 12 years and the cousin four years.
Premier Gallop’s Labor government shut the settlement in 2003, whereupon a UN committee condemned the closure as racist. Robert Bropho in 2008 got three years – increased on appeal to six – on five counts of unlawful carnal knowledge of a girl under 13. Judge Nisbett described Bropho as “a bully and a repeat liar who had sexually abused the complainant from the ages of 11 to 22.” Bropho in turn likened himself to Martin Luther King and Gandhi. He died in prison. In 2014 the government flattened the derelict settlement.
For interest I’ve constructed an admittedly weird timeline about Aboriginal violence:
Prehistoric: Paleopathologist Stephen Webb in 1995 publishes his analysis of 4500 individuals’ bones from mainland Australia going back 50,000 years. Priceless bone collections at the time are being officially handed over to Aboriginal communities for re-burial, which stops any follow-up studies. Webb finds highly disproportionate rates of injuries and fractures to women’s skulls, with the injuries suggesting deliberate attack and often attacks from behind. His findings, according to anthropologist Peter Sutton, confirm that the clubbings of women have been common over thousands of years.
1788: First Fleeter Watkin Tench notices a young woman’s head “covered by contusions, and mangled by scars”. She also has a spear wound above the left knee caused by a man who dragged her from her home to rape her. Tench writes,
They are in all respects treated with savage barbarity; condemned not only to carry the children, but all other burthens, they meet in return for submission only with blows, kicks and every other mark of brutality. When an Indian [sic] is provoked by a woman, he either spears her, or knocks her down on the spot; on this occasion he always strikes on the head, using indiscriminately a hatchet, a club, or any other weapon, which may chance to be in his hand.
Marine Lt. William Collins writes, “We have seen some of these unfortunate beings with more scars upon their shorn heads, cut in every direction, than could be well distinguished or counted.”
1790: Governor Phillip’s indigenous confidant, Bennelong, takes a woman to Port Jackson to kill her for payback. He inflicts two severe wounds on the head and one on the shoulder. Phillip is appalled that an Eora woman within a few days of delivery has fresh club wounds on her head.
1802: An explorer in the Blue Mountains writes how, for a trivial reason, an Aboriginal called
Gogy took his club and struck his wife’s head such a blow that she fell to the ground unconscious. After dinner … he got infuriated and again struck his wife on the head with his club, and left her on the ground nearly dying.
1830s: George Robinson in Tasmania says that men court their women by stabbing them with sharp sticks and cutting them with knives prior to rape. They barter their women to brutal sealers for dogs and food; one woman voluntarily goes back to the sealers rather than face further tribal violence.
1841: Port Phillip’s assistant protector of Aborigines reports that a young Bolagher woman is speared twice in the face and eaten by Targurt people at Lake Terang. (Trigger warning: The account doesn’t square with schools’ Polyanna versions of pre-contact culture). He reports:
The bowels and entire viscera having been disengaged from the body, were at first portioned out; but from the impatience of some of the women to get at the liver, a general scramble took place for it, and it was snatched in pieces, and, without the slightest process of cooking, was devoured with an eagerness and avidity, a keen, fiendish expression of impatience for more, from which scene, a memory too tenacious upon this subject will not allow me to escape; the kidneys and heart were in like manner immediately consumed, and as a climax to these revolting orgies, when the whole viscera were removed, a quantity of blood and serum which had collected in the cavity of the chest was eagerly collected in handsful [sic], and drunk by the old man who had dissected the body.
The flesh was entirely cut off the ribs and back, the arms and legs were wrenched and twisted from the shoulder and hip joints, and their teeth employed to dissever the reeking tendons, when they would not immediately yield to their impatience. The limbs were now doubled up and put aside in their baskets; and on putting a portion of the flesh upon a fire which had previously been lit, they seemed to remember that I was of the party; something was said to one of the women, who cut off a foot from the leg she had in her possession, and offered it to me…
…During the day they brought another part, and some half-picked bones, and offered them to us. The head was struck off with a tomahawk and placed between hot stones in the hollow of a tree, where it has undergone a process of baking, and it is still left there otherwise untouched. [9]
1845: Explorer Edward John Eyre, who is very sympathetic towards Aborigines, nevertheless records:
Few women will be found, upon examination, to be free from frightful scars upon the head, or the marks of spear wounds about the body. I have seen a young woman, who, from the number of these marks, appeared to have been almost riddled with spear wounds.
1875: Anthropologist T.G.H. Strehlow describes a black-on-black massacre that year in the Finke River area of Central Australia:
The warriors turned their murderous attention to the women and older children and either clubbed or speared them to death. Finally, according to the grim custom of warriors and avengers they broke the limbs of the infants, leaving them to die ‘natural deaths’. The final number of the dead could well have reached the high figure of 80 to 100 men, women and children.” All up, the two tribes lost 20% of their members.[10]
1900 approx: Walter Roth (1861-1933) a doctor, anthropologist and Chief Protector in Queensland narrates that when a Pitta-Pitta girl first shows signs of puberty, “several men would drag her into the bush and forcibly enlarge the vaginal orifice by tearing it downwards with the first three fingers wound round and round with opossum string. Other men come forward from all directions, and the struggling victim has to submit in rotation to promiscuous coition with all the ‘bucks’ present.”
And around Glenormiston:
A group of men, with cooperation from old women, ambush a young woman, and pin her so an old man can slit up the shrieking girl’s perineum with a stone knife, followed by sweeping three fingers round the inside of the virginal orifice. She is next compelled to undergo copulation with all the bucks present; again the same night, and a third time, on the following morning.
1905: The local telegraph operator at Fitzroy River reports a five-year-old half-caste girl, Polly, “was out with the old woman, Mary Ann, when a bush black took her away for two nights during which time the blacks here said he made use of her. Such actions as that of Polly and the men are very common among the natives.”
1934: Anglican lay missionary Mary Bennett testifies,
The practice to which I refer is that of intercision of the girls at the age of puberty. The vagina is cut with glass by the old men, and that involves a great deal of suffering … I remember my old Aboriginal nurse speak with horror of the suffering which she had been made to undergo.[11]
If a Kimberley woman was thought to be ‘running around’, a group of men will take her into the bush, and so cut her genitals that she will be incapable of ever again having sexual intercourse.
1960s: In Warrabri, “old men looked upon their young wives ‘as their pension ticket’; it was also a matter of prestige to have a young wife.” In the 1970s bride prices were from $500 to $1000.
1970s: John Coldrey, later a Victorian judge, deals in Alice Springs with a traditional man who has inflicted 201 separate injuries on his crouching wife. She bleeds to death. Coldrey finds that the wounds are on traditional punishment areas of the body, and convicts him of manslaughter, not murder.
1978: A man at Ernabella still feels guilty because, when he was small 35 years earlier, he crept out to watch a corroboree. The next morning the group killed his mother over it and he was deposited by the group into the care of Ernabella Mission.[12]
1980: Ivan Imityja Panka is angry with his wife because she refuses to cook meat for him. Both are drunk. After thrashing her near-fatally, Panka forces a piece of rippled reinforcing steel up her vagina, killing her. [New Delhi’s “Braveheart” in 2012 died in a bus when thugs similarly used a jack handle]. Panka’s defence relies on a husband’s traditional rights of chastisement if provoked.
In Numbulwar, NT, a drunk severs a sister’s limb, going at her with an axe as well as a spear.
1997: A man, his wife and her brother are drinking around their campfire. The husband says something out of place to his wife, and the brother, instead of punishing the husband, clubs his sister, massively fracturing her skull. An elder of the Ngukurr gives evidence this is a hangover from customary law: “That’s her punishment – you know. She got to take that…”
2002: At Maningrida, Jackie Pascoe Jamilmira, a 50-year-old wife killer, forces sex on a 15-year-old promised bride. Justice John Gallop of the NT Supreme Court sentences him to 24 hours jail for unlawful sex, saying the man was exercising his traditional rights. The girl ‘knew what was expected of her. It’s surprising to me [that the defendant] was charged at all’.
2003: Gerhardt Max Inkamala, 21, at Hermannsburg digitally penetrates a seven-month-old girl’s vagina, causing serious injury. His sentence is increased after appeal from five years to nine.
2004: Morgan Jabanardi Riley, 27, sexually assaults a two-year-old at Tennant Creek, digitally penetrating her vagina and anus as she screams in pain. He gets 4.5 years non-parole, later increased to 6.5 years.
2005: Louis Nowra writes his book, Bad Dreaming, after a spell in Alice Springs hospital, where he saw many girls and women severely injured from domestic violence.
Some of the women’s faces ended up looking as though an incompetent butcher had conducted plastic surgery with a hammer and saw. The fear in the women’s eyes reminded me of dogs whipped into cringing submission.
2006: The Aboriginal Child Sexual Assault Taskforce visits 29 NSW Aboriginal communities. It describes child sexual assault as a ‘huge issue’ in every one of those communities. Aboriginal witnesses tell the inquiry that the assaults on girls and boys are by grandfathers, fathers, stepfathers, uncles, cousins and brothers, often important men, including some non-Aboriginals.
2008: A husband stabs his wife multiple times with a steak knife, which is within traditional bounds — Yolngu wife punishments are deemed valid if they leave scars but do not kill. The husband gets a short sentence and this minor punishment is quashed by Southwood J.
2008: Nearly 400 men from the Central Australian Aboriginal Congress make this apology:
We acknowledge and say sorry for the hurt, pain and suffering caused by Aboriginal males to our wives, to our children, to our mothers, to our grandmothers, to our granddaughters, to our aunties, to our nieces and to our sisters
2009: Dave Price, non-Aboriginal husband of Bess Price, is shocked by elders’ open comments in 2009 that their women can and should be executed for sacrileges. The comments come after a policewoman unwittingly drove onto men’s ceremonial grounds. Lyndsay Bookie, chairman of the Central Land Council, tells ABC TV news:
It’s against our law for people like that breaking the law, they shouldn’t be there. Aboriginal ladies, they’re not allowed to go anywhere near that. If they had been caught, a woman, aboriginal lady got caught she [would] be killed. Simple as that.[13]
Dave Price complains that neither feminists nor human rights activists care about this variety of capital punishment.
2013: Veronica Hudson 42, is jailed for six years for manslaughter for stabbing her partner, Woody Heron, in the chest at Bendigo on December 26, 2011. Heron had earlier been gaoled for five years for assaulting her by kicking, biting and stomping on her head, breaking her jaw. He had also pulled her teeth out with pliers. Three days before she killed him, he slit her throat from ear to ear, though not deeply, and cut her arm and hand. She was released from a psychiatric hospital into Heron’s custody two days later. On sentencing, Ms Hudson sobs to Justice Betty King: “I just want to say I’m sorry. I didn’t mean it.”
2017: Police dub Roebourne in the Pilbara “town of the damned” because of the child sexual abuse, seen as “staggering”, “a cancer” and “an almost unrecoverable crisis”. Children there are more prone to being raped than almost anywhere else on earth. Police Commissioner Karl O’Callaghan likens the district to a war zone for little kids, with about 130 men either suspects or accused. The town is also afflicted with drugs, violence, gambling, house break-ins and per capita alcohol consumption three times the WA average. Men use welfare payments not only buy grog but to bribe children for sex.
Present day: See my three essays of last June, here, here and here, particularly covering astonishing rates of removals by welfare officials of babies and children from Aboriginal mothers in households plagued by domestic violence.
Meanwhile I can’t see how a constitutionally-endorsed but unelected Voice in Canberra would fix anything,
Tony Thomas’s new book from Connor Court is Anthem of the Unwoke – Yep! The other lot’s gone bonkers. $34.95 from Connor Court here
[1] Report of Father Nicholas, Parish Priest in Broome, in Royal Commission on the Condition of the Natives, 1905, Perth, WA.
“I regret to state that I know of 44 non-Christian infants who have been killed by their mothers at birth, and one child even of four years of age who was killed and eaten by its mother: now the latter is a Christian. I always let the blacks know when I visit their camps that I am fond of their children, and offer them so much rice and flour for any infant they do not want.”
[2] Jarret, Stephanie, Liberating Aboriginal People from Violence. Connor Court, p v, p291
[3] A UWA team quoted by Skelton adds a new twist to the “Stolen Generation” hype of Sir Roland Wilson by citing “the forced removal of children and elders from families and communities”. What elders? Did the state place their “stolen” elders in orphanages or farm them out to childless couples?
[4] Alice Springs Crown Prosecutor Nanette Rogers, who dealt with many rapes of infants, has said that witnesses were regularly intimidated and reports were not followed up for fear of further violence.
[5] Nowra, Louis: Bad Dreaming. Pluto Press, North Melbourne, 2007, p48
[6] Our Greatest Challenge Aboriginal: children and human rights. Hannah McGlade. Aboriginal Studies Press, 2012 P78-82
[7] Ibid, p83-88
[8] Traditional Australian Aboriginal Culture: From Pioneering Sources. Monograph, Alistair Crooks. P171 2019.
[10] When Pauline Hanson, then member for Oxley, quoted this account in 1996, an Aboriginal woman elder replies, “Mrs Hanson should receive a traditional Urgarapul punishment: having her hands and feet crippled.”[27]
[11] Windschuttle, Keith, The Fabrication of Aboriginal History: The Stolen Generations. Macleay Press, Sydney 2009, p464
[12] Today he would be deemed a member of the “Stolen Generation”.
[13] Even children could be killed for real or imagined sacrileges.
Not surprising that no one has yet wanted to comment on Tony’s piece.
Firstly, none of what he says is incorrect, but none of it is relevant to the referendum being proposed.
Secondly, no one should be under any illusions that violence is somehow unique to Australian aboriginal communities. At the time the British “acquired” the continent as a colony, aboriginal communities had virtually no contact with any other culture for tens of thousands of years.
So perhaps ask how violent were other hunter gatherer societies 20 thousand or more years ago, or even how violent were other hunter gatherer societies that have only recently had contact with modern societies. Some of these, such as in South America are just as violent as has been documented in the societies in Australia.
Also consider that the British were one of the most enlightened and progressive societies at the time – being at the vanguard of abolishing slavery, yet the Royal Navy at the time of the occupation of Australia still practised keel hauling and flogging its sailors hundreds of times for minor infractions, a very good example of “cruel and unusual punishment”.
So what about the referendum? Much like climate change it is possibly another example of a problem where every one says “something” must be done, this is “something”, therefore we must do it. Since it is likely not to succeed, the question is moot, but even if it did, would it change anything?
I’ve been fortunate enough to have lived and worked in some of these remote communities, so can attest that what Tony says is not inaccurate. But it misses the point. Aboriginal communities have their own internal coherence and a sort of charm, even if this has been corrupted by alcohol, drugs and the failure to adapt to the modern world. It isn’t all rape and murder, probably just as English villages in the middle ages weren’t all rape and murder (even though this probably happened at much higher rates than today).
Personally I don’t think “the voice” will achieve anything, but perhaps it will help promote awareness of problems and the real solutions – which is the same as everywhere – education (especially of girls and women), employment and other economic opportunities.
LikeLike
Why has this article been [re]printed in Cliscep? It seems to have little if any relevance to climate or energy.
Neither (as pm…. argues) does it depict the life of all Australian aborigines. In my only visit to Australia, I met several who helped out with camping tasks and were a font of knowledge about the local area and it’s fauna. Campfire meals would have been rather dull without their presence.
LikeLike
???
LikeLike
Hi, Alan is quite right, this piece isn’t about climate/energy. A fortnight ago I posted here a piece about the taxpayer funded Australian Broadcasting Commission and its woke approach and bias on both climate and this referendum. The piece attracted positive comments suggesting quite some overseas interest in this referendum*, as a possible Brexit moment for the elite class down under. So getting a bit carried away, I posted this follow-up piece. I must say that five years ago approx I similarly posted a rather non-climate piece, got chastised, and swore (falsely) never to re-offend. I suppose this time I’d better swear truly to stick to climate/energy.
* Alan Kendall says:
29 SEP 23 AT 10:28 AM
Tony, thank you for your latest epistle about attempts seemingly to give Aborigines more political clout than other races in Australia. This is the first I have heard anything about it. I am especially interested because for many years I lived in Canada, another country with a large population of indigenous (=First Nation) peoples, many of whom feel themselves overwhelmed by the majority white population (even though that population is very diverse and commonly divided). My wife and I were especially interested in racial matters in Canada since we adopted a Chipewyan daughter, and as she grew up she suffered some racial prejudice in the 1970s (interestingly when we moved to the USA (California and Texas) this prejudice entirely disappeared, only for it to resurface when we moved back to Ontario).
There would have been absolutely no way, in the 1970s, for Canada to attempt anything like that being proposed in Australia. I wonder if things have changed sufficiently there by now? Somehow I doubt it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tony please don’t assume that my comment implied that I was not interested in what you were writing about. My speculation about Canadian indigenous groups was my way of demonstrating that interest. I only wrote what I did because I did fail to discover any link to climate or energy and did wonder if I had missed something. Commonly these days I tend to skip-read articles and have to go back to determine meaning or intent.
I also wondered just how biased your treatment of aboriginal peoples might have been. As I wrote, my very limited experience would seem to be rather different from the impression left by your article. But then I fully acknowledge the age of my experience and its limitations. As I wrote even earlier, it would be much appreciated if you could add a little more context to some of your writings for us non-Australians.
LikeLike
A serf thinks no little thing to change the Australian Constitution. Brexit not an exact parallel but something like it, or in hind sight , the Magna Carta, who knew how that would play out? Re Tony Thomas post and Climate Change, today (and likely yesterday) difficult to separate Cli Sci from politicks, – Climategate, Michael Mann, Stephan Lewandowsky and John Cook surveys…
Tony Thomas documents the problems for a percentage of aboriginal women in an old culture not based on equal rights before the law. I think our present situation in Oz, which is NOT based on equal voices and free speech but gives privileged status to a limited cohort of the population, undermines our democratic Constitution and like Climate Change Science, gives unequal air time to one side of a debate and labels the other side Mis/Dis-information.
https://www.google.com.au/search?q=john+anderson+the+voice&sca_esv=573154237&source=hp&ei=UyQpZZLOBI-O2roPjYWs-Aw&iflsig=AO6bgOgAAAAAZSkyY5IbqRxFmiNUHsE5gd3wewvTBiXW&o
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Secondly, no one should be under any illusions that violence is somehow unique to Australian aboriginal communities.”
As I understood this TT piece, it’s an antidote to a very common “progressive left” narrative that Australian Aborigines were living an Arcadian existence entirely free of violence, where all decisions were made by wise elders at great conferences of the gathered indigenous nations held under the stars, etc. etc.
As an archaeology undergraduate in the mid 1980s, I asked my professor what he thought of such stuff (which wasn’t supported by anthropological literature, but was prevalent among a certain type of wounded and offended bearer of oppressed peoples’ burdens). He simply quipped, “so why did they carry shields?”
So TT is not making a case that AA’s are *uniquely* violent, but dispelling the progressive “noble savage”, “AAs were never ever violent until Bad White People showed up and taught them evil White People ways” twaddle. Bruce Pascoe is a very successful propagandist for this fantasy, and he has been adopted wholesale into Australian school curricula (something to be grateful that TT also uncovered). There needs to be pushback.
As to whether non-climate articles should occasionally run here: TT is a consummate sceptic, an awesomely good researcher, and excellent journalist. He runs climate stories but also indigenous affairs stories. There’s clear crossovers. He won’t be on this earth forever. Take it as a privilege to read his words straight from the oven, while you can.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Well well, the Referendum to put a “third chamber” of Aboriginal advisers into the political system has been resoundingly defeated, about 60%-40% on population and with a NO vote in all States and one of the two “Territories”. The only YES electorate was the micro-territory of Canberra. Plus in New Zealand the Green/Left/Woke Jacinta Ardern/Minns party has been defeated as well.
btw thanks Alan for your suggestions.
LikeLike
Those in the UK may not have seen the electoral results map of Australia after the referendum vote count. The whole of Australia was coloured red for “no”, except the capital city inner urban areas, and the territory of Canberra (the ACT). These are the same electorates that are the wealthiest in the country.
So there is an almost perfect correlation between the economic ruling class, and what so many have suspected, the “woke” cultural elite. The whole thing is a stark division of social class, between the ruling upper class/cultural elite, and the lower Australian classes.
But more appalling is that the “yes” campaign for the Voice was noticeably dominated by personal attack, condescension and arrogance. That was widely commented on. You know, “all ‘no’ voters are racist ignorant brainwashed far-right wing conspiracy theorists who hate oppressed peoples”, that sort of thing. The “no” campaign, never short of rational arguments, didn’t do that. So now we see from the results map, what was actually happening was a form of class war, where the ruling elite was quite viciously punching down on the lower classes.it felt during the xampaign like it was class contempt, but couldn’t be proved. Now we know. It was.
It’s a spectacular phenomenon to realise. I’ve actually got my PhD in anthropology, but of course have read a lot of sociology as part of my field. And I never knew the social make-up and classist nature of Australia would be this starkly structured. It’s staggering, and for me, probably a kind of political turning point.
LikeLike
What were the arguments used in favour of the yes vote? My initial reaction upon hearing about the proposal for a new advisory (?) body to advise the existing governing chambers was how undemocratic. Also I would have thought if there had been anything worse to promote racial divisions in the country then I failed to discern it. Thus I cannot fathom how 40%of the voting population failed to appreciate the potential dangers of voting yes.
LikeLike
Alan, the amazing thing is, substantive arguments did not feature prominently in the “yes” campaign at all. The PM, (“Albo”, who the one who talks like he stuffs wads of tissue up his nose), kept harping on about (nasal voice please) “Eergh, this is a generous offer by our first nations people to walk hand in hand down the road for recognition”.
When it was revealed that the Uluru statement was in fact a three-step plan for Voice, Truth, Treaty, of which we were being led to vote only on the first stage; instead of proudly saying “Yep, that’s the substance of it”, Albo backpedalled, quickly took off his t-shirt proudly exclaiming those three catch-words, and shoved the whole lot in the attic like a mad aunt, saying it was all misinformation. No, it was a generous walk hand in hand, all about the vibe, just a modest request. Absolutely refused to engage in the detail.
So then, it was set up: people digging out three years’ worth of substantive statements from the activists who had put together the voice, against “yes” campaigners who, realising it was electoral poison, combatted that by saying it was all conspiracy theories from far-right wing racists. It really degenerated into a farce. But that’s why I say, “yes” was marked by predominance of ad-hominem attacks, “no” had a field day with the facts.
LikeLike
“The Aussie elites are in meltdown
The mass public rejection of the Voice to Parliament has come as a rude shock to the cosseted intelligentsia.”
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/10/19/the-aussie-elites-are-in-meltdown/
LikeLike
“Australians Were Right to Reject the Racial Discrimination of The Voice”
https://dailysceptic.org/2023/10/19/australians-were-right-to-reject-the-racial-discrimination-of-the-voice/
LikeLike