I guess it had to happen – the green/left has now captured Rotary International, headquarters for 1.2 million members of 35,000 clubs. Rotary leaders and activists have side-stepped Rotary’s constitutional ban on engaging in politics, and swung Rotary against fossil fuels and cheap coal and gas-fired electricity.

Rotary’s switch illustrates Quadrant’John O’Sullivan’s First Law that “All organizations that are not actually right-wing will over time become left-wing.”[i]

From last month, and for the first time, Rotary Foundation’s $US1.1 billion fund began accepting applications from clubs for international climate projects. These are premised on “climate change and climate disruption” and can include renewables for villages, support for communities hurt by alleged global-warming-influenced droughts, storms and floods and promoting “community-based advocacy initiatives” for the environment.

Rotary’s creators were determined it should and must stay out of politics. The Standard Constitution , proving as effective as wet Kleenex, says clubs

♦ shall not “express an opinion on any pending controversial public measure” (Article 14/1)

♦ “shall neither adopt nor circulate resolutions or opinions and shall not take action dealing with world affairs or international policies of a political nature.” (Section 3,1a: “Non-Political”).

♦ “shall not direct appeals to clubs, peoples, or governments, or circulate letters, speeches, or proposed plans for the solution of specific international problems of a political nature.” (Section 3, 1b). (My emphases).

The paradox is that Rotary International would inflict added harm on close to a billion Third- and Fourth Worlders with higher costs for fossil fuels.[ii] These mainly-African unfortunates toil without electricity and mechanisation. The Rotary activists accuse their defeated conservative opponents of being “politicizers” for resisting green/Left illusions about climate “disruption”. It’s as if they themselves are non-partisans innocently seeking overthrow of centuries of capitalist progress. The activists are literally rejoicing at Rotary International’s “glorious announcement”. They cite Mexican Rotarian Salvador Rico

I am in tears of joy, gratitude, and full of hope! I know that we are going to save the planet, all living beings, and all of humanity!

 Things aren’t actually so rosy at the Rotary fund:

Foundation Funding Crisis: For the second time in two years the World Fund is likely to run out of money to provide matching dollars to Global Grant applications. Last year the funds ran out in May but this year the outlook is more dire … To compound the problem there will be a big waiting list of projects for the new area of focus supporting the environment.”  

 Meanwhile outdoors, there’s another temperature pause under way (no global warming for seven years). “Science” journal conceded last month that the climate models exaggerate actual and forecast warming, the UN’s 26th annual gab-fest in Glasgow is unravelling like all its 25 predecessors, and Chinese and Indian coal power is swamping everything the West does on renewables.

Climate aside, Rotary’s actual emergency is that membership has stalled at 1.2m for 20 years, diminishing its community presence. Fortunately the 35,000 Rotary clubs operate almost independently. A club can plug on with its art shows and sausage sizzles, and spend the money on whatever good works it prefers. The problem is that Rotary’s official tone has changed, and the activists will now widen their political breach.  

The shift to “progressive” is already under way. Rotary’s big conference last June was “inspired” by speaker Ms Vanessa Nakate from Uganda, young, black, female and a climate-doom fanatic on the  junket circuit.

In Uganda, however, there are priorities other than 1degC century’s warming. Only 10 per cent of peasants have mains electricity while girls are openly sold for the sex trade. Ms Nakate presumably opposes her desperate country’s $US16 billion development of its proven oil and gas reserves. She likes COVID lockdowns  for a “complete turnaround” in climate lifestyles even as lockdowns worsen starvation in Kampala slums.

Ms Nakate is a  revolutionary leftist on the governing council of Progressive International. Its manifesto includes:

We are workers, peasants, and peoples of the world rising up against the reactionary forces of authoritarian oligarchy … Our aim is to break with the patriarchy while disrupting the binary structure of gender on which it relies … Fossil fuel industries are driving us into climate catastrophe … Capitalism Is the Virus. We aspire to eradicate capitalism everywhere. 

Likewise, Rotary is now striving to align its goals with the UN’s 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) for 2030.   UN bun-fights among 120 NGOs in 2015 whittled 1400 proposed goals down to 17 feel-goods plus 169 targets. Denmark’s Bjorn Lomborg has eviscerated the SDG follies.

The Rotary Action Group, with its 1300 members in 70-80 countries,[iii]wants connections with the UN Environment Program (UNEP), a body founded by the UN’s Maurice Strong, who was caught red-handed in 2005 over an illicit South Korean cheque for $US998,885.

Australians helped push Rotary’s switch to woke.  President (2017-18) Ian Riseley, who chaired the Environmental Issues task force, hails from Sandringham, Melbourne. Dr Chris Puttock, chair of the Action Group, is Maryland-based but worked for 35 years in Australia.  Melbourne PhD candidate (RMIT) Patricia Armstrong is chair-elect.

Rotary leaders and activists alike have relied on long-debunked tales of starving polar bearsdrowning coral islands, and millions of imaginary climate refugees.[iv] The Rotary Environmental Action Group founder/leader Karen Kendrick-Hands of Wisconsin is still pushing the melting-Himalayan-glacier errors from the IPCC 2007 report. Publishing that alarmist nonsense almost got IPCC chair Rajendra Pachauri fired and forced a corrective audit of IPCC processes.

The 2018-19 president Barry Rassin’s oft-repeats claim that the Bahamas will be under water in 50 years from the two metres of rising seas by 2100. The IPCC models’  likely range is actually 0.26 to 0.82 m by 2081-2100.

Action Group’s leader Dr Chris Puttock led off a major presentation in June with someone’s pic of three fat polar bears on a beach. As a polar bear whisperer, he explained,

These three polar bears look as though they’re asking someone for ice, perhaps. The ice is disappearing for these polar bears and it is not there for them. This is something humans are doing to the world to endanger these species. 

In the real world Polar bears are thriving  and any ice loss is no bother to their hunting. The rest of his talk was equally misguided.

Puttock’s Action Group has provided a climate homework list for Rotarians. First-up book is Farewell to Ice by Cambridge’s ice “expert” Professor Peter Wadhams, who has been mercilessly mocked for predicting an ice-free Arctic by 2013, then by 2016 etc. In fact the 2020 minimum extent was 3.74 million square kilometres. The other books are equivalent.

Rotary’s new politicking was engineered partly via an overtly political campaign group, Citizens’ Climate Lobby (CCL), 120,000-strong and founded by wealthy ex-Rotarian Marshall Saunders. CCL’s signature plan is for carbon taxes raising $US700 billion a year by 2035 (in 2012 dollars), and offsetting monthly “dividend” cheques to US households. Mysteriously, 60 per cent would be net better off; the other 40 per cent will rue the program.

An adoring profile in the official Rotarian Monthly says “the Rotary ethos remains central to his mission and methods” and describes Saunders as “one of the great souls of the planet”.  The magazine lamely excused CCL’s politicking because it “brings an even-handed approach to advocacy” with its “friendly persuasion” of legislators. CCL’s advisory board includes James Hansen, whose predictions to Congress in 1988(accompanied by media fraud and since falsified) kicked off the global warming scare.

Rotary’s Karen Kendrick-Hands briefed CCL members on getting at Rotarians. One of her slides for CCL reads,

Acknowledge that you understand that the club can’t endorse, but invitethe community leaders in climate change to join CCL in its quest for solutions.

She conceded, “I almost get tarred and feathered as a guest talking about climate change to conservative clubs; it was not very fun.” Hendricks-Hands, from the 500-strong Madison, Wisconsin, club, thinks warming “is the fundamental deciding issue of all time.” She claimed to CCL that although Rotary bars politics, members are also urged to be active and informed citizens, and they need to reclaim their political will to fight climate change. “I would not bother with the science”, she told CCL. Instead she provided them with memes for Rotarians , such as:

♦ Polio eradication projects: Polio is faecal borne. Climate-change induced floods will redistribute the faeces through village environments. “If you can’t conquer climate change your water supply is not safe, it will up-end your campaign to eradicate polio.”[v]

♦ Clean water projects:“If your water projects depend on melt-off from the Himalayan Glaciers and there are no more glaciers [because of climate], your water project is toast.”

♦ Peace-building projects: “How do you help the world find peace, when climate change is causing millions of climate migrants to go on the march?”

♦ Dumping diesel generators: “Rotary would do a huge service to the world if it moved every water project from a diesel pump to wind or solar.” 

A big fan of teen Greta Thunberg[vi], Kendrick-Hands finished:

I know Rotary can’t endorse these things. If every CCL [group] makes sure they have a member in every Rotary Club, that is the best way to reach to the grasstops that Rotary connects with. It is not poaching, it is encouraging people whose values do align to go ahead and join [CCL].[vii] (at 26.40)

Gaming the process

The leadership has been itching to get into climate advocacy for years, so Kendrick-Hands  was pushing against an open door. Rotary sent her to Katowice, Poland, in 2018 as its first-ever delegate to the annual UN climate talks. Katowice relies on electricity from brown coal. This reliance so appalled her that she described her trip to Katowice as “into the belly of the beast”. I hope she wouldn’t say the same about my brown-coal-powered Melbourne.

In 2015 Rotary International (RI) approved her group. A series of Rotary presidents then personally endorsed the climate-apocalypse led by the  president from Melbourne Ian Riseley. He headed a  task force on the environment “which championed the new area of focus”, rather than audit it.

The Action Group in early 2020 urged that environmental causes should be added to the six other causes that Rotary funds with Global (i.e. international) Grants to clubs for their projects. Anti-emission politics was buried in fluff about useful but micro projects. In the paper’s 1200 words “climate change” is mentioned only twice.

COVID sidelined the process but after a scrabble the leaders of Rotary and its Foundation unanimously approved the new focus in the closing hours of the 2020 international Rotary conference. This announcement side-stepped controversy by not mentioning “climate change” at all. A few months later came the guidelines for grants, with climate politics now out in the open. Item 4 is headed, “Addressing the causes of climate change and climate disruption and supporting solutions to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases.” (How Rotary intends to address the burgeoning emissions of China and India is left unsaid). The new Rotary goals are (with my emphases)

♦ Providing access to locally sourced, renewable energy … as part of holistic interventions to mitigate climate change and disruption.

♦ Strengthening the resilience of ecosystems and communities affected by climate change and climate disruption.[viii]

♦ Supporting adaptation and resiliency strategies for ecosystems and communities affected by climate-related events… [They mean “weather”].

♦ Supporting education to promote behaviours that protect the environment

♦ Supporting environmental education programming in schools that aligns with local government curriculum… [If Australian schooling is any guide, “environmental education” is a Trojan horse for brainwashing kids about alleged planet perils].

 Promoting community-based environmental education, environmental awareness and advocacy initiatives …[This seems to open the way for Rotary-funded campaigns against fossil fuels].

Implementation began last July.

Pushback by conservatives

A problem for the Rotary activists was that some Rotarians “committed to denial” were also wealthy donors — a $US1m individual donation is nothing rare. 

Kendrick-Hands told her sympathisers in the Citizens’ Climate Lobby  that President Barry Rassin chose to speak of “embracing environmental sustainability” because “the words ‘climate change’ were too toxic for some of the old people in the room who are major donors to Rotary.” [at 21.00mins].

In her closing remarks to the Riseley-led environment task force on February 3 last year she said,

I have seen Rotarians … threaten to curtail their generous funding of Rotary currently. I believe this small, vocal group has been effective at wrongly politicizing the humanitarian crisis we all, but especially the most vulnerable, are facing from environmental degradation and climate disruptions…  

There are likely many more of us in Rotary who believe, as does [Socialist] UN Secretary General Guterres, that the state of the environment is the defining crisis for civilization. 

There’s a thirst for Rotary’s moral authority. Embracing the environment (or planetary health) as a cause, we believe, will open many opportunities for Rotary’s future and for the world.

Rotary conservatives and liberals had duked it out in the pages of the Rotarian monthly for USA in 2019. The October issue ran half a dozen letters denouncing the sceptics, including

♦ Pro-warming scientists are non-political but “denialists” are pushing vested and political interests

To continue reading this enthralling piece, click here


  1. Tony:

    In Uganda, however, there are priorities other than 1degC century’s warming. Only 10 per cent of peasants have mains electricity while girls are openly sold for the sex trade. Ms Nakate presumably opposes her desperate country’s $US16 billion development of its proven oil and gas reserves. She likes COVID lockdowns for a “complete turnaround” in climate lifestyles even as lockdowns worsen starvation in Kampala slums.

    That’s a young black woman told. Then there’s this:

    Kendrick-Hands told her sympathisers in the Citizens’ Climate Lobby that President Barry Rassin chose to speak of “embracing environmental sustainability” because “the words ‘climate change’ were too toxic for some of the old people in the room who are major donors to Rotary.”

    Old people who care about truth and the fate of the millions of black young people, especially the very young, who will continue to be victims if there is no mains electricity for their families.

    That’s a great article.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. “I have seen Rotarians … threaten to curtail their generous funding of Rotary currently. I believe this small, vocal group has been effective at wrongly politicizing the humanitarian crisis we all, but especially the most vulnerable, are facing from environmental degradation and climate disruptions… ”

    Here’s a conundrum. One side politicising an issue is not playing politics, but when the other side responds, that’s political. Making no value judgment on the issues, I notice the same thing in the English FA. A few years ago there was a furore around games played near Remembrance Sunday, with teams being banned (iirc) from wearing a poppy badge, because it was a political gesture. Today the national team, and all Premier League teams (with the FA’s full backing) take the knee a la BLM before every game. I can only assume that the rules have changed, or that someone has decided that’s not a political gesture. I wonder what would happen in November if a team decided to have another go at wearing poppies on their strip?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. In an age of menticide, delusions and obsessions seem reasonable to the afflicted.


  4. Richard, I recently did a series of posts on World of Hurt from Climate Policies, providing infographics on four issues:

    Zero Carbon Means Killing Real Jobs with Promises of Green Jobs
    Reducing Carbon Emissions Means High Cost Energy Imports and Social Degradation
    100% Renewable Energy Means Sourcing Rare Metals Off-Planet
    Leave it in the Ground Means Perpetual Poverty

    The last one is right on your point:

    World of Hurt from Climate Policies-Part 4

    Liked by 2 people

  5. @Ron “More than half the people who can’t afford electricity live in Africa”
    Libmob are working hard on that
    by increasing the number of people in Europe that can’t afford electricity
    they’ll be able to claim “Now only 30% of the people who can’t afford electricity live in Africa”

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.